j4_jjjj t1_j0ks3mt wrote
Reply to comment by kester99 in The good/ binary in morality is misguided and can be dangerous | Tommy Curry, Massimo Pigliucci, Joanna Kavenna by IAI_Admin
The sin wasnt about knowledge, it was about breaking the rule.
"You disobeyed. So you are cast out"
Yet another form of control.
kester99 t1_j0kv34z wrote
We should keep in mind that this is a myth. You may take what message from it you like, I suppose. I'm sure there's more than one thread of meaning in there. I agree that it wasn't about 'knowledge' in general at all. It was about 'the knowledge of good and evil' and our inability to judge good and evil because of our limited mortal understanding. (This aligns with the later observations that 'we know not what we do', 'judge not, that ye be not judged', etc.) Thus the stricture enjoining them to not eat of that fruit, eh? If it was about obedience and control, any kind of tree would do for the story, I would think...the tree of really tasty cookies perhaps...'Don't touch' thunders God. 'Those are my cookies!' Instead, the tale specifically refers to the knowledge of good and evil. Every time we declare an enemy to be evil, as they declare us to be, we taste that fruit: war and conflict and the loss of paradise.
j4_jjjj t1_j0kvl6a wrote
Fair point, the tree of knowledge (imo) seems to extend beyond just good and evil though, and may even refer to a heightened state of consciousness where we are aware of our actions (ie having a conscience and other attributes)
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments