armandebejart t1_j2lxoat wrote
Reply to comment by Oninonenbutsu in Atheistic Naturalism does not offer any long-term pragmatic outcome of value when compared to Non-Naturalist views, such as Theism by _Zirath_
More precisely, the “illusory “ clause is false.
Oninonenbutsu t1_j2lyzq8 wrote
It's all false: https://sites.nd.edu/arcadian-dialogues/files/2020/01/The-Convergence-of-Naturalism-and-Teleology-Grace-Schippers.pdf
Though there's a whole variety of different views on purpose under naturalism, or views which don't necessarily conflict with naturalism. But you're correct insofar as that the "illusory ones" stand out, as I'm not sure if anyone holds that view. Either objective purpose exists or it does not lol.
But maybe I'm not understanding what they mean with illusory.
armandebejart t1_j2qakgm wrote
I’m not sure what he means by any of it.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments