Submitted by BernardJOrtcutt t3_10df9ua in philosophy
Perrr333 t1_j4px9q8 wrote
Reply to comment by Wanderer1898 in /r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | January 16, 2023 by BernardJOrtcutt
No particular fields. I knew a really nice and smart professor primarily working in logic who spent a while wasting time on some philosophy of language, many tedious and reinterpretations of modern philosophers (your Mills and Sartres etc., but also more obscure figures I can't remember the names of), a rather arrogant philosopher of economics who was doing things like taking models and assume they were intended as true descriptions of reality, and much more. There were still probably more people doing at least somewhat interesting and good work in the department than not, but when reading papers you'd find just so much that adds little value. As for students, the average level of ability was low.
I have a substantial amount of disrespect for metaphysics, but I don't think the philosophers in that field were better or worse than average, I just think the field itself is largely wrongheaded.
SeaAnywhere1845 t1_j5benem wrote
Interesting and good are subjective. They could also find great meaning in the small focuses that you think adds little value or in the philosophy of language. There is an enormous amount of work being done across topics and with different issue areas out there, perhaps you just haven’t found the modern work that strikes you and that you find significant yet. It may be helpful to engage more with this material you think is wrong or pointless - there may be something your missing about it or you could develop your own counter theories by writing out what you think is wrong about them. If you don’t see contemporary philosophy that strikes you, start writing out your own ideas and then find if anyone out there has similar conclusions.
Perrr333 t1_j5c5ck4 wrote
Yeah, you're probably right
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments