Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

ApiContraption t1_ixcyfiu wrote

Replying to [deleted] (#615,452)

Please post any comments that are not a photoshop as a reply to this comment and leave the top of the thread for original content.

I, Bot, removed my first comment to keep this nest at the bottom of the page.

Check out the /r/photoshopbattles "Best of 2020" Results!

Other subreddits for 'shoppers: /r/cutouts, /r/battleshops

^Posting ^a ^cutout? ^Please ^read ^this.

^(Helpful links for this image:) ^Other ^Discussions ^| ^KarmaDecay ^| ^Google ^Image ^Search

^(This is an automated response) ^FAQ ^| [^Send ^Feedback](http://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=apicontraption&subject=Feedback thingId&message=Link to post

1

BurnSWE t1_ixgk8py wrote

Replying to [deleted] (#628,822)

I do feel like the "sustainability" tag at the end of the article is trying to make it seem like burning "fossil fuels" isnt at all bad for the climate.

It is not what she is writing I know. But her entire career has been based on plastics and she is telling us about where "fossil fuels" come from, but it doesnt make it sustainable. It is the tag that ircs me :-)

3

Corerue t1_ixh3r7r wrote

Replying to BurnSWE (#628,981)

True and I'm all for making sure we live in a more sustainable world. But defacing art. Heated demonstrations are not the way.

They need to be using all this money and their following to make a company that solely focuses on bringing green energy forward.

Anything else is just wasting time. And bot of boy first time I've ever had si many negatives lmfao.

0

have_you_eaten_yeti t1_ixhm3sf wrote

Replying to [deleted] (#630,907)

I think the protestors want them to set limits on dumping at sea and for things like fuel efficiency and better emissions filters. Ships are definitely the most efficient method for moving product, but they do pollute a lot and much of that is because of lack of regulation.

1