Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Phyr8642 t1_j9gfv5q wrote

No shit. We still fly those?

2

Dr_StrangeloveGA t1_j9hti5k wrote

Quite a bit, actually. Real time intelligence that satellites can't provide, relatively inexpensive to operate compared the SR-71.

3

spekt50 t1_j9i30z8 wrote

And doesn't leak all its fuel on the tarmac to boot.

2

Dr_StrangeloveGA t1_j9ihwgj wrote

Well yes. And doesn't require a space shuttle type of support. U2 doesn't require the air and ground resources of the SR-71.

The difference between a U2 and and SR-71 is like Nascar vs F1. Very different flight charistics and missions.

2

MIAMarc t1_j9gtixt wrote

Yes. We keep a few on hand for atmospheric research and also situation like what happened.

0

Gregory_malenkov t1_j9ix5k7 wrote

NASA has a few that they operate for this purpose. The USAF still operates a fleet of around 30 U2s, for real-time intelligence gathering that’s just not really possible for satellites.

1

K9YO-15 t1_j9gemc1 wrote

It was the only plane that can fly high enough.

1

BrightlySandy t1_j9go84n wrote

the main thing is to make sense to shoot down. China makes balloons like hot cakes

1

Latvian_Pete t1_j9i2euz wrote

And a TIE fighter just out of frame on the left

1

MrEloi t1_j9gotam wrote

I thought that the F-22 got up to 50,000 feet and the missile climbed the remaining 10,000 feet?

This photo show the plane at 60,000 ft or more ....

The shadow cast onto the balloon is all a bit too perfect.

Note: technically, the F-22 can reach 60,000+ ft in some circumstances

0

Mival93 OP t1_j9gp7p7 wrote

This photo is from a U2 spy plane that observed the balloon, as noted in the title. Not an F22. The U2 can reach above 70,000 feet.

2

Coke_Addict26 t1_j9gpkqp wrote

It's a U2 reconnaissance plane, not an F22. This looks like it's from when the balloon was still over land and it's there to take pictures not shoot it down.

1

rsta223 t1_j9h1x24 wrote

The F-22 officially has a ceiling of 60k, and was apparently at 58k when it shot the balloon (which was at 63k, with the missile covering the 5kft difference).

(As stated by others, this is a U-2, but the 22 could actually get pretty close, and based on the flight envelope diagrams I've seen, even 60k is pretty conservative for the 22, and probably an artificial limit for pilot oxygen/pressurization reasons or something)

1

DemonAzrakel t1_j9hhtc6 wrote

I figure the published number would be intentionally conservative, not giving the precise limitations out to the public.

1

lirva1 t1_j9i0mfu wrote

...and don't forget, use those $400k rockets to knock em down. Fuck that pansy 30 mm canon shit. Bullets....hooeey.

−3