Submitted by marinated_pork t3_116yf8x in pics
Comments
00101001101 t1_j99985i wrote
Looks like a hellebore flower!
manekinder t1_j999bxe wrote
But does it add three mana of any one color when sacrificed?
t0talfail t1_j999p4i wrote
That cards really expensive right
[deleted] t1_j99c1py wrote
[removed]
Danger_Cautious t1_j99f2l2 wrote
Post Malone paid $800,000 for one, so yeah.
[deleted] t1_j99kecq wrote
[removed]
Sdrawkcab5499 t1_j99mw5b wrote
Does it sacrifice for 3 mana?
A_Carton_of_Milk t1_j99p59h wrote
Can it say it?
mobatum t1_j99s8gb wrote
Bat-Flower would’ve been a better name
sexyfeeto t1_j99sskd wrote
Wonderful
Nachteule t1_j99vlle wrote
You need those for flasks in classic World of Warcraft. That's lots of gold right there!
Pademelon1 t1_j99z3z4 wrote
There already is a bat flower - Tacca chantrieri
Pademelon1 t1_j99zbdz wrote
Reposted again - Not a lotus, actually a hellebore.
AltairsBlade t1_j9a4ohs wrote
Stygian! The best!
BootyMcSqueak t1_j9afr9a wrote
Dammit! Beat me to it!
gavriloe t1_j9ak22r wrote
So is it like a blooming onion?
bloodmonarch t1_j9aks3k wrote
Battier flower then - Taccaer chantrieri
accidentpronehiker t1_j9ap6v7 wrote
Came here for this. Thank you.
Timely_Summer_8908 t1_j9aqkki wrote
I'm not saying you're wrong, but I'm having a bit of trouble finding this exact variation.
derpderpderpfizzfizz t1_j9arm30 wrote
I Wonder how it looks under UV
Independent-Ad5154 t1_j9at7gh wrote
Hot damn that’s a gorgeous flower
emillang1000 t1_j9b3obb wrote
Artist proof. TECHNICALLY not a legal card, but it's just lacking the back and it was both signed and owned by Christopher Rush himself, so... if he wants to play it in Vintage, NO ONE is going to say "no".
I think actual Lotuses top out at 600k-750k
joshhupp t1_j9b7q3k wrote
You get way more mana if you pick all the petals
elPedroGrande t1_j9b92wr wrote
I feel bad that I gave away my Moxen
Korgoth420 t1_j9bhgc6 wrote
Stygian, the best
lacheur42 t1_j9bijwd wrote
I sold all my dual lands in like 1998 for weed money, haha
I think I got like $10 a pop, which was enough for a few eighths.
Harkxium t1_j9c2npq wrote
its not worth 30,000$ so its not as cool as the paper one.
[deleted] t1_j9c3s2m wrote
Now that is a pretty flower.
k1n9ef t1_j9c5c2u wrote
Worth like 20k in mint condition.
The_Cozy_Burrito t1_j9c8dtg wrote
Beautiful
Pademelon1 t1_j9ceko2 wrote
Not sure the exact cultivar - there's a bunch of double flowered black ones, particularly from the 'Onyx' series.
Note that this is an old flower, with all the stamens having dropped off.
HarmlessSnack t1_j9ceu45 wrote
No, you tap it to draw two cards, and then play Pot of Greed to draw two more cards!
picomtg t1_j9cs7ew wrote
Same u get an upvote.
Timely_Summer_8908 t1_j9d6ojh wrote
I found this one, but it still looks different. Has the color variation but the shape looks off.
Careless-Motor-7154 t1_j9dwipx wrote
Damn that’s beautiful. And the perfect image of the number 1 MTG card of all time and the holy grail herself, Black Lotus.
Careless-Motor-7154 t1_j9dwzgq wrote
At the time, you spent your money on something you enjoyed and what those were worth at that time. So time/money spent on something you enjoyed at that time is definitely no loss. Time/money spent on anything you enjoy to you is special and in no way a waste lol!
[deleted] t1_j9e3yjv wrote
[deleted]
House0fShadow t1_j998k08 wrote
Christopher Rush did it better.