enemy_of_your_enema t1_j9ut41w wrote
Reply to comment by Aggressive-Mud6856 in Tables turn on Allegheny County assessments, as new math favors owners over tax collectors, schools by RadioChris1
>And nobody wants to vote for that, as no-one wants to see their taxes go up.
I think people could vote for this if we knew it meant we'd get specific improvements in schools/public services as a result. That's exactly how the parks tax got passed a couple years ago.
Aggressive-Mud6856 t1_j9v7bgt wrote
I agree with you in principle. However, I think it's tough given the historical nature that we approach taxes with to be able to set aside buckets for certain improvements. If we were like other states that had specific ballot initiatives to vote on and people actually did then I think that would work. The issue, as I find it in my community is that many people would vote against any form of tax increase for schools based off of either political considerations or simply because they feel that if they don't have kids in the schools, they shouldn't have to pay any property tax.
Personally, I would much rather go to a tax initiative system as opposed to a general tax but that's not what we've done historically and would require a fairly significant mental change. But that's just my opinion.
Sorry for the rambling sentences, I'm using text to speech and it doesn't pick up that it should put a comma in 😉
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments