Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Aggravating_Foot_528 t1_jctpz3z wrote

Reply to comment by Flip3408 in Questions About Tree Removal and Property Lines by Flip3408

It may be easier if you can handle it just to pay for the whole thing. She's never going to pay and no tree company is going to get involved with an angry neighbor involved if you don't know where the property line is. My guess is that a good survey would be more than $1000 but I could be wrong. I don't know for sure, but they're expensive because they require research beforehand (shit is old here in western pa) and then taking accurate measurements.

Also if the tree is very large they may need a crane/bucket. That adds cost too. But they need to be able to take it down piece by piece safely, especially if it's over a structure.

You could always sue if she refuses but suing and being able to collect is a whole different story.

Or, you could find a tree company that won't ask questions and just have them come out, say they're all on your land, and pay for both of them to be taken down or trimmed, and the neighbor would be none the wiser if she's never actually there. And if she ever says anything just play dumb. That may be the best case scenario honestly.

1

Flip3408 OP t1_jctr98j wrote

Makes sense. The trees are in a terrible spot for removal, they're on a steep slope with maybe 8' of sloped yard between the house and a steep drop off in the back, and maybe 6' between mine and my neighbors house to the side. I'm expecting removal or maintenance is going to be very expensive. While I'm usually in that same mindset that I'd rather just do it myself, in this case it might be thousands of dollars.

2

Aggravating_Foot_528 t1_jctt0i2 wrote

I like doing stuff myself too but it's worth getting a professional for most trees since you could die. I agree.

4

nonymiz t1_jcu08c9 wrote

just for reference... I had 3 trees removed a couple years ago. They were extremely large and overgrown maple trees. It was $4K to have all them removed and to have the stumps and roots ground out. (There was an amazing amount of roots above the ground spreading out from the trunks) It was basically 1K per tree, plus an addtional 1K for the grinding.

I know that I could have it done a bit cheaper, but I had a professional service come in that had proper and efficient equipment. You can get it done cheaper if you're OK with one of those outfits that are basically just two guys and a chainsaw.

I used Keystone Tree Techs; I think they're based out of the Monaca area; I'm in the north hills. Not sure they go to south hills.

3

burritoace t1_jcxnyef wrote

Survey should be $500-800 or so, maybe a little more if they flag the corners.

2

Aggravating_Foot_528 t1_jcxp409 wrote

OP. It is prob worth getting a survey, flagging the corners, and maybe get them to flag the property line where the trees are. And then take lots of pics. All good for a crazy neighbor who may dispute everything, move the flags, etc etc. You'll get a paper copy but it's much easier to tell everything irl from the flags.

1

GargantuanWitch t1_jcysu5e wrote

>Or, you could find a tree company that won't ask questions and just have them come out, say they're all on your land

This is a fantastic way to have something stupid happen, like a person get injured or something insignificant get broken, and now insurance is involved and everything costs 1000x more.

Or, you know, a nosy neighbor sees that you've hired an unlicensed contractor, and calls the police. Which has happened in our neighborhood, because it's full of old people who have nothing better to do than be nebby about other people's shit.

Because, you know, if you remove a tree that isn't yours, you will be successfully sued and liable for monetary damages.

1