Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

WhyHulud t1_iw2mias wrote

Reply to comment by LL_is_a_Cool_J in Analysts entirely misread the Fetterman-Oz debate. These graphs show how wrong they were by immigrantpatriot

>So all the things in the past that have been accomplished in a bipartisan manner you disagree with?:

What a dishonest and asinine way to frame the discussion.

2

LL_is_a_Cool_J t1_iw37etq wrote

Hardly.

If someone claims that working across the aisle is something they hate to hear a candidate talk about then they must be against any form of bipartisanship.

It's called blatant partisanship with a dash of hypocrisy sprinkled on top.

0

WhyHulud t1_iw3grx1 wrote

>If someone claims that working across the aisle is something they hate to hear a candidate talk about then they must be against any form of bipartisanship.

I agree that that's probably the case. But that's not what was said. He said he hates the message.

And honestly, fuck your argument. The GOP has bargained in bad faith for the last 30 years, making concessions when they had to and then backing out of their side of deals for later. You want it both ways, the left compromises and you thumb your nose at them. You're going to find it much harder to do that with the changes in the voting blocks.

2