tesla3by3 t1_ivgk2mc wrote
Reply to comment by oldschoolskater in Fetterman predicts early Republican lead in vote counting due to changes by GOP lawmakers | The Hill by oldschoolskater
I'm opposed to actually counting the votes early, as the count will inevitably leak out. I wouldn't be opposed to preparing the ballots to be scanned- opening, unfolding, etc. But that would also involve additional security measures. Right now the ballots are kept unopened in sealed cases.
demichr t1_ivgoc3u wrote
Most places secure in locked ballot boxes. This was the actual occurance of votes secure and rhen removed; that trumpers used as evidence to acuse illegal stuffed ballots
burritoace t1_ivguku2 wrote
>as the count will inevitably leak out
Does it in other states that do this?
tesla3by3 t1_ivhnksn wrote
It’s only done in like 10 states, but the likelihood of a leak will go up if more states start counting early.
I’d rather see investing in technology to process ballots more quickly.
demichr t1_ivhpaya wrote
The time is gettig them out of envelopes and ready for scanner. Tech cant get much faster.
tesla3by3 t1_ivhrd2x wrote
Which is why I said earlier I would not be opposed to opening and unfolding the ballots in advance.
Or building the technologies to prepare the ballots for scanning.
demichr t1_ivhwohd wrote
Oart of the prep is validation and scanner tech is pretty much maxed out. Usually the faster you the more jams u get you reach a sweet spot for speed / accuracy.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments