lrube t1_j2b1njv wrote on December 30, 2022 at 10:56 PM

Reply to comment by SamPost in [Serious] What can be done to stop the Clairton mill? by NickySmithFromPGH

Those are outliers not the norm. Those cases require the DOJ cooperating. It is not normal to get that relief. Yes the EPA is an administrative agency but it’s also a federal agency. They have additional resources. The Volkswagen case started in 2009.

SamPost t1_j2b45xk wrote on December 30, 2022 at 11:13 PM

There are literally hundreds of them in that database. I just picked out two well known ones since you asked for a link.

You keep throwing out more red herrings after I answer your questions. It makes me doubt your motives, and I suspect we both know the (1) DOJ doesn't need to "cooperate" to file either a civil, or even criminal suit and (2) the state DEP and the ACHD are perfectly capable of filing these suits. As per many of the examples in that database. Looking through those, it is clear they sometimes all pile on, and sometimes states go it alone.

lrube t1_j2b6263 wrote on December 30, 2022 at 11:26 PM

I went to law school for environmental law. I am perfectly capable in knowing how it works. It is not easy. I said to get THOSE types of cases you do would need DOJ cooperation especially with criminal charges. You can’t just say well obviously it’s intentional.

SamPost t1_j2bzwox wrote on December 31, 2022 at 3:06 AM

The consent decrees are literally US Steel saying "we know normal operation of our facility violates the CAA, and here's how we intent to continue". You think you need the DOJ to set up some kind of FBI sting operation? Their guilt is clearly not in question to anyone, including them.

At this point, I am pretty sure you are an astroturfer, and not an environmental lawyer. The downvotes on where I pointed out the EPA lawsuit database make it clear what is going on.