Submitted by NickySmithFromPGH t3_zz1zhm in pittsburgh

Since like 2019 (I’ve been hearing; maybe earlier) … the Clairton mill increased pollution emissions to the point where it’s often been tough to breathe in the Mon Valley. And the number of air quality alerts went up. They’ve been fined every year I believe … but they keep on emitting their pollution while just paying the fine. How can we make sure they actually stop their pollution

123

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

LostEnroute t1_j28y92f wrote

Not much can be done short of industrial sabotage. Which would be bad.

61

FuzzPunkMutt t1_j28ydh4 wrote

Vote in elections, take part in surveys, and talk to people in your social groups.

40

mmphoto412 t1_j291df2 wrote

It’s certainly something our “Pittsburgher of the year” isn’t interested in fixing.

170

tim0767 t1_j292h3x wrote

The local government can only fine them. You need the Federal Government to step in.

1

Frosty_Mycologist_53 t1_j295ikf wrote

There is a guy with a gun for a hand. I think he leads an offshoot extreme bunch part of a larger activist group called avalanche. They hang out at a bar “777” or something like that. They should be able to shut down those coke batteries for good.

[serious]

20

put_the_ux_in_sux t1_j296aa1 wrote

Honestly? Nothing. That plant has been there so long that when it was built almost every country in Europe had a royal family.

Pittsburghs air also hasn’t been this clean since basically the 1700s.

Other major sources of pollution in this city? Our open air sewers (sulfur oxides). People driving cars faster than 45 mph (tire dust particulate). People driving large vehicles that don’t have turbochargers (petroleum distillates). Any diesel vehicle. Male trees (pollen). Wood burning (particulates, smog).

25

put_the_ux_in_sux t1_j298x1d wrote

The cold air and lack of UV light creates a smog that settles into Appalachia’s Ridge-and-valley region. In winter time, the two largest sources of pollution are heating and traffic.

Harrisburg is only 40 miles from the edges of the DC metro area border.

10

Frosty_Mycologist_53 t1_j29fdmf wrote

The mon valley IS Altoona pizza, cold, in plastic wrap, sold at unimart.

  • exp. I grew up near clairton.

Also, not to sound like an old person and I know its about as helpful as talking about pollution on Reddit, that plant is like 100%+ better than it used to be. Like a warm summer picnic with grapes and cheese.

6

Confident_End_3848 t1_j29gvld wrote

Having worked across the fence line from coke ovens, I understand the concern. But also consider the practical, political implications. You will be eliminating a lot good paying blue collar jobs which is the perfect environment for Trump like politicians to move in and blame the tree huggers.

2

tesla3by3 t1_j29hise wrote

Three of the dirtiest coke batteries will be shut down early next year. No one is certain how much that will help the air quality, but some estimates are about a 20% reduction.

72

put_the_ux_in_sux t1_j29jxwc wrote

Bruh, the US Thompson Steel plant is the 9th worse polluter in the area. Clairton coke works isn’t even in the top 10.

There are about 3 dozen mills and factories in the area whose pollution outputs are far worse— 100s of tons of lead, cadmium, nickel, chromium, cobalt, benzene and xylene dumped into the environment annually.

The top 10 polluters in the area produce 70% of all air pollution and released over 1,000,000 pounds of toxic waste into the air in 2019.

21

fadedrosebud t1_j29l00v wrote

Go to the Breathe Project website, learn about their current campaigns and help them.

These people are not a bunch of impotent talkers. One of their affiliated groups, GASP, took on the issue of diesel buses idling outside of schools, spewing dangerous pollution. That's now illegal and most schools have "no idling" signs posted.

As long as we have politicians like Fitzgerald who never saw a polluting industry he didn't back, it remains frustrating and difficult. Need I repeat the importance of voting?

https://breatheproject.org/

29

James19991 t1_j29l6cu wrote

Yep, here's a conservative estimate on what it would do:

According to a report by Public Source, if that 17% reduction in coke production leads to a 17% improvement in emissions, it would make the pollution levels in the Mon Valley more in line with neighborhoods like Lawrenceville and better than the air quality in North Braddock, Wilkinsburg, and Neville Island.

https://nextpittsburgh.com/latest-news/u-s-steel-closing-the-three-most-polluting-batteries-at-clairton-coke-works/

37

isthatwhathappened t1_j29myzw wrote

Absolutely nothing, and honestly there are a lot of people whose livelihood depends on that place so you probably wouldn’t want to if you could.

−4

samr1380 t1_j29nnwv wrote

There has been an update to that report, done in 2021. Clairton Coke Works is now 3 on the list of top 10. Further to your point, making them a significant polluter to appear in the top 10, let alone 3.

16

lrube t1_j29trwl wrote

I left the ACHD recently. A big problem is the county does not pay well. The air quality department has some of the most qualified and educated people in the county but they aren’t getting any support from the county. They are understaffed and underpaid. A lot of people have left after the pandemic because we don’t have any hybrid options and other govt agencies do and pay better. US steel ties up a lot of the department in litigation and appeals. But the department is still very transparent. And as I said on the previous thread Allegheny County has stricter air quality regs than the rest of the state.

If you’re seriously interested start attending Air Quality Advisory Meetings which are public meetings. Actually go and look at proposed reg changes on the county website. Attend public hearings.

111

LessThanLoquacious t1_j2a1zvb wrote

Burn it down. Figuratively speaking of course. Our politicians aren't going to shut it down. They aren't going to punish those responsible. Picket the buildings. Block entry ways. Until enough people care to protest in numbers, and overturn police protection of the capitalists, this will continue.

21

RepoGodFather t1_j2a5hga wrote

I worked with a guy that works as an inspector there. He got married when I worked with him. His now wife sent him to pick up buns for the reception. He didn't buy any because she wanted 8 packs of 12 but they only had packs of 8 so he left empty handed. He told me the story and I said, ', why didn't you just get 12 packs of 8?" He said he didn't think of that and that's why she's mad. I'm not even kidding, the dude couldn't even figure out how to buy 96 buns...I have no doubt if he still works there today, he is somehow connected to the violations.....nothing to see here...

24

SamPost t1_j2a5vgg wrote

Nonsense. The violations are completely acknowledged and documented. The ACHD doesn't have to do any "work" except file a Clean Air Act lawsuit, and a criminal one as well. For hundreds of millions, as per other national cases. Not the small fines they go after which amount to a cheap license to pollute.

They don't do so at political direction. More pay is just rewarding them for not doing their job.

−63

SamPost t1_j2a6m8z wrote

Local (city and municipal or ACHD), state or federal officials all have standing to sue (for real, hundreds of millions proportionate to profits and damages) under the Clean Air Act. They could also issue criminal charges as these acts are intentional. They do not.

So if you continue to vote for the same people in office, you will get no change.

Vote out all the incumbents. I realize that people won't do that because it may let in some "worse" person from an opposing party. All I can say is that if you keep voting for the lesser of two evils, you get evil.

0

lrube t1_j2a83r4 wrote

Please go read the ACHD rules and regulations. You are thinking of a citizens suit under the clean air act. Criminal fines can be filed but they are actually not as high. And again it doesn’t matter because US Steel appeals everything. They appeal new permits, their fines, regulation changes etc. Go look at the ACHD Dockets. Cases are years old. US steel has a lot of money to fight the appeals.

25

IClight69 t1_j2a8rtj wrote

I called Judas Priest and they said British Steel.

−2

chefmarksamson t1_j2adldo wrote

No, but there’s a point where “best represent” is so far away from what you’d actually like to support that it’s severely demoralizing, and leads people to question the efficacy of the entire thing. Continually telling people the solution is to vote, and vote, and then keep voting isn’t wrong, per se, but it is glib, and can turn off people whose problem is disaffection, not apathy.

15

delco_trash t1_j2ahced wrote

Tbh, get Sara inamorato elected as executive

20

kesi t1_j2ajm93 wrote

Volunteer for the Sara Innamorato campaign!

−1

twistedevil t1_j2apd4i wrote

I remember reading something a year or so back that the mill could make all the repairs/upgrades necessary to reduce the pollution, but they would have to shut down temporarily to do so and are fighting against having to do that. Not sure how they could be compelled to do so, but a solution is possible.

4

Nekrosis666 t1_j2aqsp3 wrote

Yeah, my thoughts when people talk about "Just shut it all down!!!" is "Okay, and what do you do with the people who are now unemployed?". The obvious solution, at least imo, would be to have some kind of program in place to transition current workers at places like Clairton to a different job where they can receive paid training. Something they won't need a degree for, and something not too crazily different from their current work. You'd want to make the change as smooth and painless as possible for everyone so that the people who will inevitably whine and moan about it don't rally all the unemployed workers and their families behind them.

But of course that would require people in charge actually caring about workers at all.

1

adamglumac t1_j2at8qx wrote

Stop down at night, and wait until the lights come on, it looks like it’s snowing everyday from all the asbestos. Granted this was 10+ years ago but that was the dirtiest place I’ve ever worked.

−4

lrube t1_j2au5zy wrote

Okay, I’m very curious if you can link me these MEGA MILLION DOLLAR lawsuits that have happened. Also as noted those are citizen suits under the CAA.

4

SamPost t1_j2ax6hg wrote

120 workers at most. That doesn't begin to compare to how many jobs have been chased away by this situation. I know of two people myself that declined local high tech jobs because of our air pollution. Both after having been here for grad school. So they weren't ignorant.

0

geoffh2016 t1_j2axwix wrote

Out of curiosity, is there anything that can be done at the county level to increase the fines? We’ve seen fines against US Steel, but they’re generally in the tens of thousands, which is incredibly small for that size of a business. Can the county increase the size of fine (e.g., through ahem changes in the county government)?

8

SamPost t1_j2ay24m wrote

You say that like it means something. The EPA is an administrative agency and is responsible for the largest pollutions lawsuits ever filed or awarded.

−13

Nekrosis666 t1_j2ayc3v wrote

I didn't say anywhere in that that it should be the same industry. I meant that they should be transitioned away from this industry to different jobs that they could reasonably do. If we have to kill off a place where people work, we should at least try to care about the people who will inevitably get left behind now that the job they've been doing for years, possibly decades, is defunct. Finding opportunities for them in jobs that won't harm the environment or other people that they'd be well-qualified for is the only thing I can think of doing that wouldn't potentially ruin their lives.

1

lrube t1_j2ayif0 wrote

It takes regulation changes. But also some of the fines that you see aren’t for the major violations. And there also settlement agreements that have stipulated penalties which require them to pay quarterly.

7

chippersonofYork t1_j2ayo70 wrote

Do we want everything made in China ? Got to have some factories and shuthole areas or we will be at the mercy of others.

1

SamPost t1_j2az8p5 wrote

Good god, read a newspaper. Or just google and you would quickly find the EPA database (https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/cases-and-settlements) of both civil and criminal violations and settlements.

Things like the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the gulf. Which resulted in a $20.8 billion dollar fine. Or Volkswagon's $14 billion dollar settlement for their diesel emissions. The list is very long.

−2

lrube t1_j2b1njv wrote

Those are outliers not the norm. Those cases require the DOJ cooperating. It is not normal to get that relief. Yes the EPA is an administrative agency but it’s also a federal agency. They have additional resources. The Volkswagen case started in 2009.

4

Jahya69 t1_j2b3az4 wrote

Yeah it's atrocious and astounding that this is allowed to keep happening in 2022

0

SamPost t1_j2b45xk wrote

There are literally hundreds of them in that database. I just picked out two well known ones since you asked for a link.

You keep throwing out more red herrings after I answer your questions. It makes me doubt your motives, and I suspect we both know the (1) DOJ doesn't need to "cooperate" to file either a civil, or even criminal suit and (2) the state DEP and the ACHD are perfectly capable of filing these suits. As per many of the examples in that database. Looking through those, it is clear they sometimes all pile on, and sometimes states go it alone.

−1

Hot_Chance_5442 t1_j2b5frr wrote

Yeah, definitely don't do that unless you WANT to see people die. Those places are dangerous enough for their workers, no matter what type of remediation is in place. They don't need sabotaging to make things even more dangerous for them.

20

lrube t1_j2b6263 wrote

I went to law school for environmental law. I am perfectly capable in knowing how it works. It is not easy. I said to get THOSE types of cases you do would need DOJ cooperation especially with criminal charges. You can’t just say well obviously it’s intentional.

5

Dubjaxx2020 t1_j2b8tl1 wrote

Is there a town hall meeting you can go to? I am not familiar with that area much, but gathering a group of people in a protest wouldn’t be a bad idea. Could also sight some studies done on the link between lung cancers and pollution.

3

JetoCalihan t1_j2bbgcj wrote

Well there's only two ways. Arson or outlawing them entirely. Given both parties are pro business shitheads that wouldn't dare touch anyone creating jobs, your only real option would be arson. Good luck with it. My lungs are behind you... And me... Trailing by about 3 feet.

−2

dick-wart t1_j2bf5em wrote

Keep voting for people like John Fetterman. He lived there and tells you how great it is.

4

AntiqueDistance5652 t1_j2bgato wrote

That's the neat part: you can't do anything about it. They've done all the regulatory capture already, so they own all the politicians they need to continue doing what they're doing.

6

isthatwhathappened t1_j2bi4w1 wrote

I’m glad to see you think 120 jobs don’t matter, I’m sure they do to the people who hold them. I’m sure someone else took those tech jobs so the people you know leaving really doesn’t matter in the end

−2

No-Insect-5703 t1_j2bjlsq wrote

Rumor has it they will be closed in 5-10 years. USX is building a new mill somewhere down south and will Move production. Remember when they were growing to revamp Braddock and then they didn’t. It is because they are moving operations.

0

sopabe6197 t1_j2bjy7w wrote

Nothing. No politician wants to be on record for causing people to lose their jobs. If you want cleaner air then your best option is to move. The Mill isn't going away.

−2

AntiqueDistance5652 t1_j2bkd22 wrote

These few hundred people need to lose their job if they're giving us all serious health problems from the pollution. The loss of those jobs is more than worth it. It would be cheaper to just pay those people to do nothing at their previous salaries than to endure this public health nightmare.

4

chefmarksamson t1_j2bqv4o wrote

I feel like you’re missing the point. I’m giving one possible reason why a lot of people feel that the electoral process doesn’t represent them and doesn’t seem like something that they can meaningfully have an impact on. I’m not trying to argue that there’s a better way. I’m just saying that preaching to people about voting probably isn’t having the effect you’d like it to.

1

FuzzPunkMutt t1_j2bss09 wrote

I'm fully aware of it. I think everyone is.

The problem is that people, you included, are very, very quick to say the same thing.

"But Voting Didn't INSTANTLY Fix All My Problems!"

Yeah. We all know. There's some 50% of the population that varies between selfishly hating change and being straight up regressive - those people aren't going to magically go anywhere.

So my response to you, and everyone saying this, is... PLEASE, if anyone knows of something better LET ME KNOW.

Fucking hell, I am totally open to a better solution! I even buried the voting thing in between two other things, because I know it's not a good solution.

Right now, in these united states, it's the most powerful option we have, though. So let's not get caught up in disparaging it.

−1

SamPost t1_j2bzwox wrote

The consent decrees are literally US Steel saying "we know normal operation of our facility violates the CAA, and here's how we intent to continue". You think you need the DOJ to set up some kind of FBI sting operation? Their guilt is clearly not in question to anyone, including them.

At this point, I am pretty sure you are an astroturfer, and not an environmental lawyer. The downvotes on where I pointed out the EPA lawsuit database make it clear what is going on.

1

Extreme_Qwerty t1_j2c0fgb wrote

Politicians are like a zit.

You only get something out of them if you pressure them. HARD.

It's a gross analogy, but it's accurate.

When I worked for a member of Congress, he'd always ask how the mail and calls were running.

The squeaky wheel gets the grease.

4

SamPost t1_j2c1cdz wrote

That document is hilarious. I read the whole thing, and the takeaway is that "due to their relentless pursuit of environmental excellence" they are a model of green industry.

I think their employment numbers are in line with the rest of their duplicitous propaganda there. They don't break out the coke battery workers and the "ancillary workforce", so if it isn't an outright lie, they are rolling in a bunch of unrelated workers for the steel plant.

1

SamPost t1_j2c1wiz wrote

You'd have 120 jobs doing active damage to our real economic base (Eds and Meds) . Our region would be better if they didn't exist.

Do you defend Fentanyl dealers? There are probably at least 100 of them in the region. Wouldn't want them to be out of work either.

3

H3lue t1_j2c3lxx wrote

It’s smells putrid right now across from Edgar Thompson works on 12/30 at 10:35 pm

0

[deleted] t1_j2cdl41 wrote

Only here because I read Clairton Milf

1

kielBossa t1_j2cfdl1 wrote

Elect a county executive next year who will make certain the health department enforces air quality standards. Our current exec makes sure they don’t.

0

Adventurous_Acadia_5 t1_j2cwazu wrote

Yeah let’s just shut the mill down and rid men of their jobs so they no longer can provide for their families because you “believe” and “heard” with no proof.

0

Neither-Camp-1352 t1_j2d2gfn wrote

Corruption prevents the functioning of our republic. We need a purge of current career politicians, term limits, and a reigning in of the federal reserve.....which representives which have a meaningful chance of winning are representing these ideals?

All I've heard is 1 party wants to cut kids dicks/ tits off as children and the other party wants to make children birth their own incestuous grandchildren.

I'll pass on both of those options thank you very much

0

NunzAndRoses t1_j2dh935 wrote

The people who just want to pull the plug on those mills clearly don’t know the history of the area. We already tried that once and it’s turned all of those areas in to what we call “economically depressed regions” (shitholes)

5

cthulhu_on_my_lawn t1_j2dpw9p wrote

Fines that become part of ordinary operating costs are fines that are too low.

1

fadedrosebud t1_j2e719u wrote

No, it's not a diversion. I was simply using the diesel bus issue as an example of how GASP actually accomplished a change. People tend to dismiss these organizations as ineffectual, and they aren't.

1