Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

realitythreek t1_irirkf6 wrote

Maybe they’ll actually enforce it for cigarettes too. That’d be wonderful.

1

Proof-Variation7005 t1_irixfb9 wrote

I’m not sure it’s really great to have more policing for something that’s a minor annoyance at worst.

2

realitythreek t1_irj2lyq wrote

Just say the word policing and having limits on what you can do becomes unreasonable right? Or, idk, you can set a limit and expect people to abide by it. Like adult humans?

I don’t think restrictions on smoking in public places is unreasonable. And you don’t need an armed cop to enforce it. Someone could come by and say “hey smoke at home okay?”

1

Proof-Variation7005 t1_irj7d45 wrote

I think a city with real and legit public safety concerns and quality of life issues devoting energy to enforcing a minor annoyance that does no real harm would be really wasteful.

2

realitythreek t1_irj7hdx wrote

Cool, difference of opinion then.

1

alphabet_order_bot t1_irj7ict wrote

Would you look at that, all of the words in your comment are in alphabetical order.

I have checked 1,089,729,460 comments, and only 214,560 of them were in alphabetical order.

1

realitythreek t1_irkrgf3 wrote

Good bot

1

B0tRank t1_irkrho0 wrote

Thank you, realitythreek, for voting on alphabet_order_bot.

This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.


^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)

1