Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Proof-Variation7005 t1_irixfb9 wrote

Reply to comment by realitythreek in Providence City Council looks to ban cannabis use in parks by GhostOpera406

I’m not sure it’s really great to have more policing for something that’s a minor annoyance at worst.

2

realitythreek t1_irj2lyq wrote

Just say the word policing and having limits on what you can do becomes unreasonable right? Or, idk, you can set a limit and expect people to abide by it. Like adult humans?

I don’t think restrictions on smoking in public places is unreasonable. And you don’t need an armed cop to enforce it. Someone could come by and say “hey smoke at home okay?”

1

Proof-Variation7005 t1_irj7d45 wrote

I think a city with real and legit public safety concerns and quality of life issues devoting energy to enforcing a minor annoyance that does no real harm would be really wasteful.

2

realitythreek t1_irj7hdx wrote

Cool, difference of opinion then.

1

alphabet_order_bot t1_irj7ict wrote

Would you look at that, all of the words in your comment are in alphabetical order.

I have checked 1,089,729,460 comments, and only 214,560 of them were in alphabetical order.

1

realitythreek t1_irkrgf3 wrote

Good bot

1

B0tRank t1_irkrho0 wrote

Thank you, realitythreek, for voting on alphabet_order_bot.

This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.

^(Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!)

1