Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

exposechefjohnny t1_j9h0yld wrote

Do you not understand that there are REAL children in those photos and videos and by purchasing and selling those images Johnny was contributing to the sexual abuse of these children? The more money child pornographers make from producing and selling imagery of children the more children will be trafficked, raped and abused. Not to mention that it is almost impossible to delete these images from the internet. Imagine being in these photos and knowing that sick humans will be using them for pleasure for the rest of your fucking life.

Open your eyes!

13

[deleted] t1_j9h3arv wrote

[removed]

−11

RVAGuywithNoID t1_j9hd2uq wrote

Are you really this fucking stupid?

Non-production offenses like possession are what drive the production.

6

ttd_76 t1_j9hq5xf wrote

Would you make the argument that someone who buys some meth should be charged the same as large meth producer because their possession and use of drugs are what drive the production?

−3

exposechefjohnny t1_j9hsy1e wrote

I don't know what kind of straw man argument you are trying to draw here, but I can only conclude by your sympathizer comments that you are either friends/ family to Johnny or that you yourself have a child porn habit.

To compare drug addiction to child pornography is absolutely inappropriate and wrong. Especially since victims of sex crimes are prone to drug and alcohol addiction. Buying and using drugs do not equate to buying photographs and videos of children being raped or abused.

10

rva-ModTeam t1_j9hq5ol wrote

Your comment has been removed at the discretion of the moderator team.

Please do not re-post this again or post a minimally-revised item similar to this without contacting our moderator team first.

3