Comments
St1Drgn t1_ja9giqc wrote
That name... it just feels odd...
Fearless_Arugula_732 t1_ja9jgcz wrote
Everyone buying a house there will have a kid named Ryleigh or Brookleighn or Codeigh so it will make sense to them.
augie_wartooth t1_ja9wzay wrote
lol as if any developers are local
JackieBlue1970 t1_jaaclqq wrote
Man, that’s going to be a traffic nightmare.
batkave t1_jaav85p wrote
Oh man my NIMBY neighbors are about to complain a lot on nextdoor and Facebook
rva_hoo t1_jab0nib wrote
barf
chasetwisters t1_jab245q wrote
That resturaunt spot just looks destined for failure due to the difficult access
edentel t1_jab2paa wrote
Not to mention the dump/quarry just off to the upper right. Hope folks do the due diligence before purchase and aren’t shocked after.
goodsam2 t1_jacy3ah wrote
They would be if the projects were smaller...
augie_wartooth t1_jad212i wrote
What does this even mean? Do you honestly think local developers would be any better? Developers are developers regardless. See, for instance, local man Michael Hild.
goodsam2 t1_jad7rs8 wrote
I think we basically created the developer group by adding regulations. Developers basically came about because they jump through regulations and funding and stuff otherwise it would mostly be construction workers.
Pre-1980 the amount of "developers" was much greater because you could just turn a single family home into 3 row homes.
Developers wouldn't really come from elsewhere to build 3 houses on the former property of one.
Who builds and what gets built is partially based on size.
turnipmeatloaf t1_jadbw4f wrote
Oh great, more car dependent sprawl. Just because it brings density, doesn’t mean it’s the right kind of density
turnipmeatloaf t1_jadd6ct wrote
It brings all the downsides of dense development and none of the upsides!
c53x12 t1_jaeogk0 wrote
10 Cloverleigh Lane will be a hot seller
opienandm t1_ja9e131 wrote
Even the developers are coming here from NoVa