khuldrim t1_j9f1np8 wrote
Reply to comment by systematical in Where to find arrest records/specific information on a crime? by [deleted]
I would, if it could be proven that he acted against the law or recklessly, if i was on his jury. Its the only thing that separates us from wild west vigilantism. In reference to the homeowner, i mean.
systematical t1_j9fbxum wrote
Good thing there is 10 jurors, you're a nut.
khuldrim t1_j9fh1kf wrote
Because I want to apply the law equally and not let a homeowner get away with killing fleeing people in cold blood?
systematical t1_j9i6gdq wrote
Some criminal, who broke into this dudes house and was going to do god knows what. What if the owner was a 100 lbs female instead? What happens then? Does she get assaulted physically? Sexually? The OP did the world a service.
Cold blood? From what I understand, this criminal is still a live and in custody where he belongs. Why defend pieces of shit? If OP went American History X on the guy sure, but he gave him one hook and a push down. Boo-hoo, go live in CHAZ you nut.
khuldrim t1_j9i756p wrote
Once they’re running from you they are no longer a threat. And the push down could’ve caused head trauma, and the suspect was already retreating so it wasn’t necessary.
I’m not a nut, I just don’t defend rampant thuggery in the guise of “home defense”. Seen too many “they were running away when shot in the back” stories where the shooter gets away with it because of right wing style home defense laws, aka you can kill anyone for any reason even at the moment they’re not actually a threat to you. That’s called murder. Or assault.
systematical t1_j9i7m3i wrote
No one was shot in the back here, apples to oranges, a punch and a push is amazing restraint IMO. We disagree, pointless to continue this. Good luck in life.
P.s. You downvote everything you disagree with. Funny haha. Enjoy.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments