sleevieb t1_j9xj9w2 wrote
Reply to comment by opienandm in A non-update on the murder at the 7-11 at W Broad/Meadow by opienandm
They get nothing from that and risk opening themselves up to liability.
It’s a terrible idea to comment on any ongoing investigation.
opienandm OP t1_j9y8rkd wrote
Meanwhile, pressers are held to spread lies. It’s laughable that you use this argument in light of the VAST amounts of commentary the RPD has made over the past two years.
In general, I agree with the ongoing investigation commentary thing, however please explain how an investigation would be compromised or any additional litigation risk beyond what the RPD already seems comfortable with would be incurred by stating: “Our investigation continues and we believe the any risk to the public as a direct result of this incident has passed.”
sleevieb t1_j9yu36l wrote
First of all “no risk to the public” suggests they are a risk to a different group of people which is othering some poor black people so you can assuge your own paranoia and anxiety.
Second of all you don’t know why a cooperating witness or co conspirator or whoever would come forward. Maybe they fear for the life.
What if someone involved in this incident shoots it out in the street and clips a civilian. Now the cops own words are back to haunt them.
I can’t believe you got me defending rpd lol this is just common sense.
And yeah they make up terrorist attacks to justify going to war against their own citizens over protests of mass destruction but dude also lost his job and fucked his career up on that one. Trust Stoney and get balogned
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments