Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

goodsam2 t1_je6ay7m wrote

Reply to comment by freetimerva in Youngkin signs 700+ bills into law, vetoes 3. by freetimerva

>Veto 1 - "SB 1051, would allow utility companies and broadband service providers to park their vehicles on private property temporarily without the owner's consent and prohibit property owners from removing or towing the vehicle for up to 72 hours." "This bill violates the fundamental rights of property owners" - Youngkin

If this was written as the person asked for the service provider then yes, also 72 hours seems like a long ass time.

4

freetimerva OP t1_je6guxm wrote

Person asking for service would imply consent to come on the property. But I'd be pissed if they abandoned their vehicle for 3 days after a service call and I get in trouble for towing it.

If I was dominion I'd just start selling off my fleet parking lots and telling employees to just leave the vehicle at last service call.. and you could do it Friday to Monday with that law.

9

ExtremeHobo t1_je6ttft wrote

I think you would put Dominion out of business pretty quick when you scattered the fleet for 100s of miles and left the employees no way to get to their work vehicle without parking at a random place and then somehow getting their car again after parking at a new random place.

4

freetimerva OP t1_je6wuo7 wrote

Lol. Funny thought and obviously that's not what I meant. But it's easy to leave large vehicles and equipment on site and take shuttles to the small lots for employees when you're working for months on end in a neighborhood laying underground.

2

goodsam2 t1_je6j2rg wrote

I was just reading the landlord tenant bill of rights and the 24 hour notice rule was waived if you asked for them to say fix your water and a plumber could fix it. That was in there specifically.

The 72 hours seems insane, maybe like 8 hours. IDK?

−1