[deleted] t1_izagyh1 wrote
Reply to comment by Asterion7 in Casino tops Richmond wish list [to VA General Assembly], but affordable housing lies at the heart by CrassostreaVirginica
[deleted]
Asterion7 t1_izah3im wrote
Let Petersburg have it. Casinos are long term losers everywhere they go.
[deleted] t1_izawhr1 wrote
[deleted]
Asterion7 t1_izb0cov wrote
I don't think we need casinos in Virginia period. But I certainly don't want it in Richmond. Let the people in Petersburg decide what they want.
[deleted] t1_izb11z3 wrote
[deleted]
Asterion7 t1_izb442l wrote
Lol. How is it an argument that it will be bad in Petersburg so it might as well be bad here and opinion?
[deleted] t1_izb5yzk wrote
[deleted]
Asterion7 t1_izb970r wrote
Do your own research. All the studies were linked here the first time around. Casinos and sports stadiums are almost always long term net negatives for municipalities. I don't think it's changed in the last two years.
As for "political boundaries" last time I checked Petersburg was a decent drive down an interstate. I think we will be mostly insulated. Again I don't think Petersburg should go for it either. But I don't live there or vote there.
Gwala_BKK t1_izb2q1f wrote
Not true though is it? Casinos are a blatantly immoral and predatory business and accepting that into your culture has snowballing effects. Petersburg shouldn't have one either but I'd rather it be outside of the city than have it directly festering in the heart of what is currently a very positive movement
[deleted] t1_izb3jl3 wrote
[deleted]
Gwala_BKK t1_izbwy71 wrote
It most certainly hasn't been accepted into the culture of downtown Richmond. Sure low class people outside of the city like it but that's different.
littlehelppls t1_izc68p5 wrote
Let's not take it to class discrimination. But it is predatory on people of specific socioeconomic statuses.
littlehelppls t1_izc6cbm wrote
Let's not take it to class discrimination. But it is predatory on people of specific socioeconomic statuses.
Gwala_BKK t1_izcdzjk wrote
You're right, I shouldn't have said that.
Vapid_Ingenue t1_izce8eb wrote
Just for clarity, what exactly do you mean when you say "low class people?"
gravy_boot t1_izb52rt wrote
Oh so you’re saying the casino’s radius of negative effects would include the entire city if it was located in precinct 806.
[deleted] t1_izb6olo wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_izb89do wrote
[deleted]
gravy_boot t1_izb8yfs wrote
> But moving it a few minutes further down the road outside of an invisible border will prevent it from affecting the city at all.”
Literally no one here has said that- this is just you inventing something that doesn’t exist so you can wag your finger at it.
[deleted] t1_izbaeg0 wrote
[deleted]
gravy_boot t1_izbcsmr wrote
Ah ok, one comment which wasn’t referring to any part of Petersburg that’s “15 minutes” south of Richmond. But I guess you adeptly conclude that we all agree it’s fine.
[deleted] t1_izbdi1e wrote
[deleted]
gravy_boot t1_izbf2ra wrote
Petersburg the city, which is what that person was talking about, is a 30 min drive. Not 15, which is what you are imagining that we all believe is fine.
> any logical reading of the anti-casino folks’ arguments in context makes it clear the vast majority believe that.
This is instructive about how your broken logic works. Because you saw a handful of comments by noisy redditors you can somehow deduce what the “vast majority” believe.
I guess that’s similar to how you deduced what 85% of people want based on the votes of 15%.
littlehelppls t1_izc5z20 wrote
Casinos are garbage, keeping garbage out of our city is the only smart move here
tornadogenesis t1_izav6sg wrote
As someone who lives in Richmond i cannot vote for for people in Petersburg. If they want it they can vote yes. I can however vote and say, "No thank you, not in our city. Take your filthy money elsewhere."
That money up front sounds appealing but there is a much greater cost in the long run. The casino is not a boon, it is a money drain that funnels our cash into the pockets of the rich and the politicians.
gravy_boot t1_izanwwl wrote
> where people near it all want it.
This is wrong, like 1/10 adults in that area voted yes.
[deleted] t1_izapzxn wrote
[deleted]
gravy_boot t1_izaz8m6 wrote
You said everyone in the area wants it, which is the lie. What is the population of that precinct, and district? The turnout was like 13%.
[deleted] t1_izazmlc wrote
[deleted]
gravy_boot t1_izb02wu wrote
No I did the research and have the numbers, but you’re the one making bogus claims so you do the fucking work now.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments