Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

User-NetOfInter t1_j6fwdzl wrote

It’s almost like they should support building more housing to accommodate this

44

HatefulDan t1_j6gh34v wrote

They are. It’s just that it’s unaffordable and are starting to resemble NOVA prices. It once was that if you charged over 1k for housing, that you’d have allllll the amenities. Now, even the shit sheds are 1k

22

User-NetOfInter t1_j6ghg6d wrote

They’re not building enough. The city still makes it too difficult to build more.

9

HatefulDan t1_j6gk6e9 wrote

Right. But if you continue to charge a premium+ price for each property that you DO develop, then it doesn’t matter how little or how many you build, if most people are still priced out.

2

User-NetOfInter t1_j6hpic2 wrote

Market powers will drive down premiums if you allow competition.

The only solution is to build more. Period.

5

PyreDruid t1_j6kg00p wrote

If you build enough housing, pricing will go down.

Supply and demand is real, you're talking about a situation where supply never is allowed to catch up.

5

RulerOfTheRest t1_j6g53nl wrote

As they should. The problem right now with interest rates so high and the cost of materials and labor being skewed, the growth of new housing isn't close to where it needs to be to help stabilize things...

8

gowhatyourself t1_j6hlppj wrote

This is why when people on here say they want more affordable housing I don't think they realize just how unaffordable newer construction would be for most people without massive subsidies the city doesn't have due to how they don't pull in revenue from the counties....where most people are moving anyway.

11

Charlesinrichmond t1_j6idrim wrote

they could cut cost of development in the city and it would be an effective massive subsidy. City costs a LOT more money to build in

2

User-NetOfInter t1_j6g8kcn wrote

Then they should control what they can control. Which is zoning and building permits

6