Submitted by MistWeaver80 t3_10qm1jv in science
Reply to comment by RagnarokDel in Planting more trees could axe summer deaths by a third. Modelling of 93 European cities finds that increasing tree cover up to 30% can help lower the temperature of urban environments by an average of 0.4°C and prevent one in three heat deaths as a result. by MistWeaver80
Eh, green roofs are usually realllllly heavy and require much bigger foundations. Better to limit building to tree-canopy height and get the vegetation benefits from overhang canopy.
Yeah the whole point of a roof is to keep the elements away from the house. Adding tons of soils and vegetation and watering it everyday is just asking for trouble, specially if you cheaped out on the installation.
Most green roofs don't require tons of soil and watering vegetation. They're usually pretty thin layers of media and root barriers for grasses and other native plants to live, they're called extensive green roofs.
Intensive green roofs usually don't cover the whole thing, and have deeper layers and larger plants. They're much less common.
The intensive ones are awesome to see, but not practical. Thd extensive ones won't have near the impact on local temperature of trees.
It might not be better than painting all the roofs white for heat but they'd still do better than shingles or solar panels. A combination of that for the roofs and trees, especially native where possible, would not just impact local temps but also fauna.
True, birds and bugs would absolutely love it.
I hate going up on to my roof too. So many things could go wrong with a setup like that. Screw that noise. I want a low maintenance roof.
Limiting buildings to tree canopy height cements the housing crisis. We need high density housing.
It's a bad situation to be in. Every where you look there's pain.
We really should't get too hand up on this. Street trees apply almost anywhere. And green roofs are fine but just the trees outside to cover the asphalt is already a massive improvement. Trees and some green roofs where possible is totally doable and a massive improvement. Looking for a perfect solution is a great way to do nothing
There’s way more untapped vertical space in single-family neighborhoods in desirable cities even below five stories than there is housing demand. NYC might be the one exception but even there the surrounding suburbs have a lot of potential. We need high-density housing but we really don’t need buildings above 80 feet tall to achieve it except maybe in NYC.
The climate benefits of building height max out between 5-10 stories anyway.
Urban sprawl is HORRIBLE for climate.
Suburbs are a major problem
Of course. But you could immediately halt all exurban development and also provide plenty housing to ease the housing shortage if we just upzone inner-ring suburbs to medium-sized multifamily buildings.
building up is more expensive, plus people kinda want their own 4 walls.
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments