Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SaltZookeepergame691 t1_j7h61lf wrote

It’s significant (and the 95% CI indicates it is reasonably so), but this is a post hoc analysis of an outcome they already ‘knew’, in a trial that already had many outcomes, making this result at pretty high risk of being a chance false positive. This is probably why they don’t give actual p values - the findings are hypothesis generating, not confirmatory.

28

supertexter t1_j7hbikw wrote

That sounds reasonable indeed. Interesting result though, the future will tell us more.

1