Submitted by swhelan_tn t3_10xt51r in science
I know right? My spouse has a fish allergy. Not as immediately deadly as most peanut allergies but just from being near it she can still get swelling, irritation, and in extreme cases throat closing. She can't eat certain foods at many restaurants, cant eat at all at certain resteraunts, can't even go in some grocery stores or even walk down certain streets in bad areas. But we live in the Pacific Northwest so it's everywhere. Could we visit Japan? Probably not. Could we visit London? No idea. Fish and chips are popular there but I just don't know if its popular enough that you can smell it in the air.
Hopefully this kind of research continues to make breakthroughs for all allergies.
Damn, I feel for her. Luckily I'm ok to smell it and only have a minor reaction. And it's pretty easy to avoid as long as you take some basic precautions. Fish I can't even imagine. Not even sushi...
[removed]
There aren't all that many fish & chip shops in London or the UK. You could easily spend a week in central London and not see any of them. I'd definitely avoid fried food in any pubs though, as they often share a deep fat fryer.
I would love to visit all these countries in Asia but with all the peanuts and the language barrier I'm too afraid to go.
We're so we sign up?
I relate to this so much. I also have a severe peanut allergy, can't go anywhere without some level of anxiety.
[removed]
Find the original study here
I hope this actually sees the light of day for people in the near future. This would be so amazing for my son.
I have a general allergy to most fruits in vegetable in different forms. Also constant pollen and dust allergy. Its probably a mild immune disease but if I could take a pill to just stop it I would try a banana or have a papaya salad
Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
Perhaps my understanding is not correct? Have we not essentially figured out that the increasing frequency of food related allergies is related to the topical application of food derivative proteins in a largely functionless manner in cosmetic and cleaning products? Baby body encounters new protein in wrong context (like peanut derivatives in a skin cream), arranges immune reaction, then later deploys that reaction when the child finally gets around to eating that thing rather than having it rubbed on its skin?
Is that model not well enough validated, or is my understanding flawed?
If this is the major contributor, isn't this an easily soluble phenomenon by subtraction, rather than addition?
Example sources:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5682223/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16805419/
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/12/3830
And similar citations
Source for this? I was born with lots of allergies tested very soon after birth and they faded over time, the opposite of what the above theory would suggest.
I added example citations. You can find more with a similar search string, like 'topical proteins food allergy theory', which is what I just used.
If you search for your own bias you usually confirm own bias. Soo you're going to only find articles that support your view with a search string like that.
It seems like allergic reactions are far too varied to explain with one grand theory like this. It's more likely a list of causes ranked in order of occurrence or such, not just one main cause.
So SURE maybe there is some correlation with use of food in other products, but to assume that's the one big cause that causes all food allergies would be a massive leap of faith more than anything science would support.
it's the first I am hearing of your theory..
It seems suspiciously like one explanation to RULE THEM ALL to me, a common theme for the human mind, but not so much a good way to do science.
Humanized mouse model. They translate pretty well.
[removed]
Pleasant__Bumblebee t1_j7ub03o wrote
I was just thinking about this the other day. How it would be awesome to go travelling without that constant anxiety in the back of my mind. that there’s a chance I could die at any second