Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Tempts t1_j96tkd9 wrote

That is just one part of a more robust post. And idk why you are focusing so much on that.

And this is vague because it has to be. There are professions that have many different rule sets they follow. Not everyone on Reddit is a 20 yr old boy. And not everyone on Reddit is without some level of reputation.

−17

[deleted] t1_j971ocm wrote

[deleted]

11

AimlessZealot t1_j97ktai wrote

Research what whisper networks are and why they exist. Come back and tell us if you still think that last statement is a sensible and valid basis for all people to operate under.

−3

[deleted] t1_j97x8i4 wrote

[deleted]

4

AimlessZealot t1_j989n6g wrote

No, that's exactly what you're saying. They stated it was vague because "it had to be," implying repercussions if they were too identifiable. The nature and purpose of whisper networks (which operate exclusively through gossip) is to allow important information and warnings to spread without such dangers.

By insisting that only those who can make clear accusations ever speak of issues, you are also stating anyone who faces jeopardy should either accept additional risks or not bother trying to pass any information. The worst this person's statement could lead to is others watching critically for a reason why or investigating further. That's a good thing, I think.

2

Tempts t1_j9723xu wrote

Wow. That’s amazing. What are you hoping for? Something you can use to dox people?

You are out of your mind. And when you say “you have no skin in the game” you don’t know what that means.

Read the book. Write Bessel love letters. Start a subreddit for Bessel stans. Good lord.

−14