Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

bannedPosts t1_ja49uy6 wrote

Few if any humans have had their "cognitive impairment" continuously documented over 60 or 75 years. What orifice did the "researchers" pull this metric from? Smells like and agenda to me. 96% accuracy? What's the standard measure, is it reproduceable, peer-reviewed? False positive rate? False negatives? Are these "researchers" professional driving evaluators? psychologists, statisticians, code monkeys?

1