SnooPuppers1978 t1_jb1vsy3 wrote
Reply to comment by mindfu in On Facebook, Visual Misinfo Widespread. In the runup to the 2020 U.S. Presidential election visual misinformation was widespread across the platform, and that it was highly asymmetric across party lines, with right-leaning images five to eight times more likely to be misleading. by Wagamaga
I do see issues with most social studies to be fair, and it often would feel like there must have been baked in bias affecting those.
Even with more concrete sciences there is a lot of possibility for cherry picking, and many other flaws stemming from biases. You could keep pre emptively checking for potential datasets that might be most likely to agree with your bias.
But again I personally, intuitively, based on what I have seen, would also guess that right side does a lot more misinformation, but then there is also a question of how much more and how much of that is coming due to bias from the study authors.
Because there is a certain point of interpretation where you draw the line and this could affect the results a lot. Where is the line drawn for any topics from either side to give benefit of the doubt.
And politics being such a subject worst in terms of biases.
I would like to see concrete random sample of how they classified the content, that would be interesting, but seems behind a paywall.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments