Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

marketrent OP t1_jdjtspn wrote

Findings in title quoted from the linked paper^1 and a summary^2 from the University of Tokyo.

From the linked paper:^1

>We do not need living organisms, but the existence of life in exoplanets can be probed by remains of microbes, microfossils, minerals produced by biological activities (biominerals), or any other signatures of past biological activities (e.g. concentration of biological molecules or isotopic ratios) (Cavalazzi and Westall 2018).

From the summary:^2

>“I propose we study well-preserved grains ejected from other worlds for potential signs of life,” said Totani [of the University of Tokyo’s Department of Astronomy].

>“The search for life outside our solar system typically means a search for signs of communication, which would indicate intelligent life but precludes any pre-technological life.

>“Or the search is for atmospheric signatures that might hint at life, but without direct confirmation there could always be an explanation that does not require life.

>“However, if there are signs of life in dust grains, not only could we be certain, but we could also find out soon.”

> 

>The basic idea is that large asteroid strikes can eject ground material into space. There is a chance that recently deceased or even fossilized microorganisms could be contained in some rocky material in this ejecta.

>This material will vary in size greatly, with different-sized pieces behaving differently once in space.

>Some larger pieces might fall back down or enter permanent orbits around a local planet or star. And some much smaller pieces might be too small to contain any verifiable signs of life.

>But grains in the region of 1 micrometer (one-thousandth of a millimeter) could not only host a specimen of a single-celled organism, but they could also potentially escape their host solar system altogether, and under the right circumstances, maybe even venture to ours.

>There may be such grains already on Earth, and in plentiful amounts, preserved in places such as the Antarctic ice, or under the seafloor.

^1 Tomonori Totani (2023) Solid grains ejected from terrestrial exoplanets as a probe of the abundance of life in the Milky Way. International Journal of Astrobiology, https://doi.org/10.1017/S147355042300006X

^2 Searching for life with space dust, 22 Mar. 2023, https://www.u-tokyo.ac.jp/focus/en/press/z0508_00283.html

2

AutoModerator t1_jdjsgk5 wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Shovi t1_jdlhm9n wrote

Why are some people so set on panspermia?

1

genericrich t1_jdm6ul2 wrote

Because it makes a lot of sense. If microbes can survive long periods of hibernation, then statistically there is a good chance some of them hopped a ride to earth. We get hit by 20 tons of debris every single day. It's not an outlandish theory or anything.

4

ubermeisters t1_jdmqda9 wrote

The poetic reflectance of nature's preferred method of reproduction (chemical delivery of ingredients to other ingredients) is a lot to turn down in the absence of better theories. Plus, these compounds had to come from somewhere, and we can't find any mechanism for creating them on Earth before life existed, combine that with the fact that we've found literally every single building block needed for life, to exist on astral bodies outside of the planet... It's a lot to dismiss.

1

ubermeisters t1_jdmq5po wrote

> Asteroid ejaculate shoots new load of possibilities into fertile theory of panspermia

1

hypnocentrism t1_jdjzmv4 wrote

Better be intelligent life, because foh with microorganisms. Not impressed.

There's probably a bazillion of earth-like planets the right size/distance from their sun with microorganisms being created in the chemical soup of deep-sea underwater vents as we speak.

−10

AlexMcDaddyD t1_jdlfdsa wrote

This is real life. You don’t get to moan about it like it’s bad writing

5

ubermeisters t1_jdmqaun wrote

I honestly would like to know why you took the time to even comment this? It's clear you didn't read the paper, it's clear you don't understand the science, and it's clear that you probably shouldn't even have this subreddit on your feed.

4