A comment so vapid, you decided to post it twice?

Well, I'll just paste in the previous reply:

And you missed the fact that I specifically stated that they have been updated during that time.

You also missed that the anti-biotech researchers haven't even attempted to make use of the built in review protocols, and it's because you need to back up allegations with data, and yet again, literally none of the studies capable of showing causation support your allegations.

Oh, and FYI, the entire history of the study designs are openly available, and each modification recorded.

The only one here ignoring anything is you, and the fact that you can't seem to understand just how vast the gap between the power of the studies you're relying are, and those that my peers and I assign the most weight to.

We actually put the studies into context with their power of analysis, not by how the results align with our existing beliefs.

Want to keep going?