Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

3

ThickD_4_thickThighs t1_ix88gsu wrote

Are we comparing indigenous healthcare in 1780s to European healthcare in 1780s when life expectancy in UK was 39 years?

We don’t know what outcome were for the indigenous because someone killed most of them before we could ask.

The fact you assume the subpar healthcare of “modern technology”(read: settler-colonial) is better with no evidence is what [insert your favorite adjective]-supremacist looks like.

A society run on that way of thinking is exactly why indigenous peoples have worse outcomes.

−1

noogai131 t1_ix88phy wrote

That's a lot of babble for what essentially amounts to calling me a racist, failing to elaborate on what an alternative system of healthcare without "settler colonial" technology would look like, and leaving. Gigachad move, but you still look more stupid than I do, and that's saying something.

4

Pechumes t1_ix9y2xj wrote

Is it due to their ethnicity, or other factors like “distance from hospital and other healthcare facilities”?

1

ThickD_4_thickThighs t1_ixa7gp5 wrote

Paper adjusts for > age, admission diagnosis, illness severity, hospital type, jurisdiction, remoteness and socio-economic status

1