efh1 OP t1_j1qzjmo wrote
Reply to comment by tornpentacle in Second law of information dynamics by efh1
Because it’s stating that information itself has mass and the current classical interpretations doesn’t. He then predicts results that wouldn’t happen under current interpretations. Adding information as part of the fundamental framework with mass and energy would certainly lead to paradigm shifts. The theory is not in contradiction to any other theories so if it was confirmed it would integrate well. The fact it’s testable means it should be considered even if you disagree with the assumptions as anything that could potentially move science forward deserves consideration.
[deleted] t1_j1r38ml wrote
[removed]
ubermeisters t1_j1tauzu wrote
maybe dark matter is just far away information?
efh1 OP t1_j1tb6qn wrote
This concept does potentially address dark matter and it’s funny to me that people are just beginning to point this out. I shared a video of Vopson explaining his theory and multiple people just commented about it as well.
So, what’s the connection to dark matter? Vopson says, “M.P. Gough published an article in 2008 in which he worked out … the number of bits of information that the visible universe would contain to make up all the missing dark matter. It appears that my estimates of information bit content of the universe are very close to his estimates.”
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments