Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

turtleface1337 t1_j03yh1b wrote

Shouldn't we all sit back for a moment and be in awe of the fact that now, we can categorically agree that this tech is actually viable? For me, that's enough for now.

1

sungazer69 t1_j046fp7 wrote

We can agree that it MAY reach viability in the future. This is just the first baby step... But enough baby steps forward and... the possibilities are insane.

12

Peanut_The_Great t1_j04yubx wrote

The experiment used 400+MJ to make 3.15MJ and is insanely expensive, there's a long way to go.

7

ofeam t1_j07q87q wrote

Yeah this seems like a giant oversell

3

mcchanical t1_j0a1esb wrote

This machine isn't in any way designed to produce usable energy. It's a brute force way to push the boundaries of our understanding of how fusion works. They never factored efficiency into the design. Obviously a prototype plant would use more expensive, more efficient designs.

The whole design of NIF could never be a power plant. It's a very expensive, one shot experiment that explores principles that can help guide the development of more sensible designs like tokamaks.

2

Peanut_The_Great t1_j0a35a1 wrote

Right, sooo would you say there's a long ways to go? I recognize this is a big step but it's not like viable fusion power is suddenly a lot closer. I want it as much as anyone I think cheap power is the solution to many of humanity's wide scale problems.

1

[deleted] t1_j076vxf wrote

[deleted]

1

Peanut_The_Great t1_j07uecz wrote

More energy was produced by the fuel pellet than what was provided by the laser which is what the experiment was about, that is a big deal but the laser uses way more energy than what actually gets to the fuel pellet. This is like a small proof of concept step in the right direction but not a sign that mass fusion power is a few years or even decades away.

1