peterdent234 t1_j0564wl wrote
Reply to comment by CatOfGrey in Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination by Razariousnefarian
Like any good study, the authors acknowledge it’s limitations.
I still think this study serves as motivation to continue the investigation. There’s something to be said about a concentration of T cells in your heart. They don’t just show up there randomly. The spike protein could be settling in the heart. Or like the study mentions, it could be something associated with the mRNA technology. Due diligence should be done to make the vaccine as safe as possible. You can’t ignore the presence of serious adverse effects and draw it up to “well it helps a lot of people, but not everyone. We can just stop here”
Also reading this as a parent of a new born I would be extremely cautious of vaccinating an infant. The article acknowledges myocarditis as a cause of 1-14% of SIDS cases. Idk the exact research of infant mortality due to COVID-19, but even without any direct proof that the vaccine causes myocarditis, I’d be wary. More research is definitely needed.
apathetic_panda t1_j05x9dq wrote
>They don’t just show up there randomly. The spike protein could be settling in the heart. Or like the study mentions, it could be something associated with the mRNA technology. Due diligence should be done to make the vaccine as safe as possible. You can’t ignore the presence of serious adverse effects and draw it up to “well it helps a lot of people, but not everyone. We can just stop here”
Well, isn't that what we needed with cross-comparative studies against vaccines not using the mRNA platform seeing as most of world isn't going to get that
You're not going to stock the Pfizer covid vaccine in Africa, and it isn't made in China.
These studies are dumb because the focus is 0.1% of the wealthiest society on the planet.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments