Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Wagamaga OP t1_j076as5 wrote

Inadequate pollination has led to a 3-5% loss of fruit, vegetable, and nut production and an estimated 427,000 excess deaths annually from lost healthy food consumption and associated diseases, including heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and certain cancers, according to research led by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. It is the first study to quantify the human health toll of insufficient wild (animal) pollinators on human health.

“A critical missing piece in the biodiversity discussion has been a lack of direct linkages to human health. This research establishes that loss of pollinators is already impacting health on a scale with other global health risk factors, such as prostate cancer or substance use disorders,” said Samuel Myers, principal research scientist, planetary health, Department of Environmental Health and senior author of the study.

The study will be published December 14, 2022 in Environmental Health Perspectives.

Increasing human pressure on natural systems is causing alarming losses in biodiversity, the topic of the COP 15 UN Biodiversity Conference currently taking place in Montreal. This includes 1-2% annual declines of insect populations, leading some to warn of an impending “insect apocalypse” in the coming decades. Key among insect species are pollinators, which increase yields of three-fourths of crop varieties and are critical to growing healthy foods like fruits, vegetables, and nuts. Changes in land-use, use of harmful pesticides, and advancing climate change threaten wild pollinators, imperiling human supply of healthy foods

https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/EHP10947

14

LateMiddleAge t1_j09b7ll wrote

George Monbiot points out that 196 of the 198 nations recognized by the UN are signatories to the biodiversity convention. Missing: Vatican City and the US.

I'm glad someone is quantifying this.

6

ILoveLongDogs t1_j0a6dch wrote

How does the lack of pollination directly correlate to the reduced consumption of healthy foods and the rise in disease? There are a hell of a lot of confounding factors for both consumption and disease prevalence.

2

DUDDITS_SSDD t1_j0aawq6 wrote

My assumption is they are implying less access to healthy produce because of less production.

6

jhansonxi t1_j09y82k wrote

Bees are simply going to have to work harder. Install artificial lights and block off their hives until they get a full 18 hours of work done. The Elon hive management method.

On a related note, how does light pollution affect pollinators? Can they utilize longer days or do they encounter biological rest limits?

9

fringecar t1_j09fygv wrote

What "unhealthy food" is being produced in the place of "healthy food"? I assume that all food starts out as 100% natural plants, so a loss and bees would not just affect blackberries being available at the grocery store, but also cool ranch chips.

2

zoinkability t1_j0c6q6j wrote

Not all plants require insect pollination to produce fruit.

For example, corn and most other grains are wind pollinated so they would not be affected by a loss of insect pollinators.

By contrast, most fruits, nuts, and many vegetables that are scientifically part of the fruiting process (tomatoes, squash, beans, etc.) are insect pollinated.

The idea behind this study is that the insect pollinated plants tend to provide healthier, more nutritious food, loss of pollinators causes those foods to be in shorter supply, and as a result people eat less-healthy diets that rely more on non-insect-pollinated foods like grains.

2

dzhastin t1_j0bnm9v wrote

The connection seems kind of dubious to me. Who’s to say those excess deaths were the kinds of people who would eat healthy even if there were a few more apples in the produce section. There’s no shortage of healthy food where I live but I know folks who’ve never touched a green vegetable in their lives.

2

AutoModerator t1_j0765tx wrote

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

JoshTay t1_j0b4wio wrote

Ironically one of the problems is bees. The hives that are carted from farm to farm for pollination don't neatly stay in the intended crop area and compete for food with native species. Most bee species do not live in colonies or produce honey, but are vital pollinators, servicing many plants that honey bees would ignore . These are also the ones most vulnerable to agri-chemicals.

As the pollination rates fall on plants in-the-wild, that affects the wildlife that depends on foraging. This is not just affecting human nutrition.

1

TheBarslug t1_j07ye8u wrote

Yes but we all know that 87.4% of all percentages are made up.

−10