> Your statement is bizarre about the unvaccinated having anything to do with the state we are in.

Higher transmission and infection rates create a higher probability of mutation. The only bizarre thing is ignoring that well documented and well observed outcome.

> therefore tends to evolve toward being more infectious and less deadly context still matters

You seem to be trying to give some intelligent and predetermined goal to a virus. Mutations are random. Whether one mutation dominates another may depend on this, but the actual evolutionary path of the virus does not.

Where did you hear that it would?

> The only likely thing is that the next mutation will be better able to replicate and spread.

According to what?

> So yeah, bizarre

Your assertions are extremely bizarre indeed. I'd like to know where you get them from and what evidence you have to back them up.