Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

stunspot t1_j2onkso wrote

One thing to remember is that "conspiracies" actually happen. There is example after example in history of those in power working very hard to construct a false reality for the masses while exploiting them in truth. Those in n power have squandered their credibility and do not deserve our trust. My point is that "conspiracy theories" (a phrase literally invented by the Warren Commission to discredit those rejecting the Single Shooter Theory of the JFK assasination) are often warrented, mete, and appropriate. It is not a sign of a poor connection to reality, but, rather, a sign of a more accurate one.

−6

j4r8h t1_j2qmqpz wrote

Something that most people on here won't admit is that science can be censored. The internet is heavily censored these days in most countries including the US. If there is some major scientific development that the government doesn't want people to see, then we are not going to see it. Science can't exactly be fabricated but it can be censored and hidden from the public eye. I am also skeptical of any science that comes directly from government agencies rather than independent research. If you don't want to consume state media, then you shouldn't consume state science either. I'm just speaking in general, not talking about wind farms here. I know very little about wind farms and the conspiracies about them seem quite silly to me at first glance.

−2

Tostino t1_j2r40qq wrote

You can read the studies and if you are educated on the topic, you can analyze it, or reproduce the study. That's the point of science. It's supposed to be open for those who want to do the work.

4