Comments
steve2sloth t1_j39gbch wrote
The significance of building a ML model to predict output is that you can switch it up and use it to predict the parameters needed for an optimal output. Thus, you could use the model to tell you what materials, layout, and dimensions are needed to make the best theoretical solar cell. That's the time saver
[deleted] t1_j39h7gb wrote
[removed]
smartguy05 t1_j394q6s wrote
I would think it would be for testing new designs or changes to current designs without having to fabricate first.
ubermeisters t1_j3956kp wrote
I guess my point is those things are already relatively not difficult to work out with math? like of course... I doubt anybody is out there developing a solar panel without first running a decent estimation of what they're going to get out of it...
smartguy05 t1_j395myf wrote
While that is likely the case there are still some occasions where an unexpected change can result in significant improvements. There is just no way to account for all the variables that exist between the math and reality.
AutoModerator t1_j37plcd wrote
Vote for Best of r/science 2022!
Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
ubermeisters t1_j38p5pp wrote
I guess I don't see any reason why an AI needs to provide an accurate prediction of a photovoltaic panels output performance. I thought those things were known variables at time of manufacturer and engineering Aren't these scientifically based principles that we are very familiar with at this point?