Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Skeptix_907 t1_j3j9td1 wrote

>I don't have to provide evidence your eduction is not my responsibility.

When you make an outlandish claim that is not common knowledge, the onus is on you to provide evidence.

>There is empirical evidence.

I've yet to see any. All I've seen is opinion.

2

SoggyMattress2 t1_j3jn3mu wrote

It's not an outlandish claim. It's mainstream science. Just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it's not true.

No, you find the studies. I'm not your research student.

Have a lovely day.

−1

A-Wolf-Like-Me t1_j3jqezb wrote

Jumping in here. You made an absolute statement in r/science.

I personally agree with you, but you need to provide a source if you make an absolute statement; otherwise just say it "could be" if you don't have the time. You are communicating on a platform where some will place trust in anecdotal evidence from redditors, and others will begin to doubt their own understanding.

We should be encouraging that people support their statements with scientific literature to reduce potential incorrect information from circulating.

3

Skeptix_907 t1_j3n0okj wrote

Respectfully, you're acting and debating like a child. If you have nothing to support your opinions and pass them off as fact, I have 12 year old cousins who do better than that.

1

SoggyMattress2 t1_j3nrpxh wrote

Because its like asking me to provide a source that the earth is round.

0