Strict_Geologist_603 t1_j6krx46 wrote
Reply to comment by CatsRinternet in New study (n = 15,764) shows repeated concussions are linked to worse brain function in later life by unswsydney
Why is it that every post on r/science has at least one snarky comment like this from someone who probably didn't bother opening the article?
awkto t1_j6ksqfl wrote
You do know you are on reddit right?
[deleted] t1_j6ksta4 wrote
[removed]
TheThirdStrike t1_j6kv1n5 wrote
It's the internet.. someone will try to get imaginary points for being "witty" no matter what.
NobodyLikesMeAnymore t1_j6l3eok wrote
That's what she said.
AintAintAWord t1_j6kuv9w wrote
And I can guarantee none of the users making the same tired comment even read the article, let alone the study included.
Girafferage t1_j6l56bk wrote
Tom is that you?
[deleted] t1_j6lcqxi wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j6n14kj wrote
[removed]
FUNNY_NAME_ALL_CAPS t1_j6m960k wrote
Having read the article, his comment still holds.
Strict_Geologist_603 t1_j6mqz6w wrote
Yes, sometimes studies have findings that sound obvious when you condense them down to a headline. There's still value in testing and quantifying things
FUNNY_NAME_ALL_CAPS t1_j6mt5po wrote
Nothing wrong with pointing out the finding is commonsensical.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments