Comments
[deleted] t1_j5hvoku wrote
[removed]
S0ulSage t1_j534td2 wrote
Most who do their nails often have fingerless gloves. Also 20 minutes is a bit extreme. Even with my at home uv light I need 3-4 minutes total to set my nails. Max would be 5-6 min if I'm doing something crazy that involves multiple layers.
Aporkalypse_Sow t1_j53x5el wrote
So then they need to study short term cumulative effects. Which I'm sure they will, but they first had to get a baseline on potential damage. The alarming part was that some of the damage would not heal. Which could mean that repeated use could add up.
Smoking one cigarette won't give you cancer, but keep subjecting your lungs to it and you increase your odds. The question is whether or not you want to risk finger cancer for fancy nails.
[deleted] t1_j54s7zk wrote
That's an awesome way to accelerate your fingers aging... Just for some paint.
JensenWench t1_j52qv5k wrote
Wait. 20 mins? Who has their hands under one of those for 20 mins? It’s like 30 seconds
Prestigious_Carpet29 t1_j52tw21 wrote
I'm a guy, and am not into fancy nails at all. Also a physicist - gut response is I can't imagine why you'd want to use UV light for that for more than 30 seconds!
(And/or if it really takes 20 minutes of UV there's probably a better way of achieving the same end)
JensenWench t1_j52u4jp wrote
I get my nails done once every two weeks. Simple polish.. the gel polish takes 30 seconds under the lamps to set. I read the headline and I was like huh?
ubermeisters t1_j55mdt6 wrote
I'm a guy. Not into fancy nails. My best friend is a girl who is definitely into fancy nails. I also have 3D printing as a hobby, part of that being UV resin related. I have worked out that the UV light which I use to cure my models after printing, is the same wavelength as the acrylic setting UV lights. it doesn't even take 5 minutes for a large model to be cured all the way through, and that model doesn't need to be clear. The longest I've seen nails take is like 3 or 4 minutes. so where does 20 minutes garbage is coming from, I really don't understand? That's a fuckload of UV light, and would make the nails beyond brittle...
CryptoYaar t1_j54pxbl wrote
Yup! I'm never using that again.
[deleted] t1_j54sai9 wrote
[deleted]
ubermeisters t1_j55mipp wrote
imagine making a life decision based on an improper article designed to scare people. think about the last time you used one of these, do you think you were under it for 20 minutes or even close? there's a substantial difference.
HeliopauseNgo t1_j52b7gm wrote
I never liked using those because they stung almost immediately and after a minute, my hand would feel like it was micro shriveling.
DistributedIntellect t1_j54ni9d wrote
"Do you taste metal?"
HeliopauseNgo t1_j573jjt wrote
I don't quite remember but the stench of nail chemicals was prominent.
DistributedIntellect t1_j57670x wrote
this is a quote from Chernobyl where the firefighters are exposed to so much radiation they can taste on their tongues and it tastes like metal.
I was making a humorous comment.
ha. ha. ha.
AutoModerator t1_j50xd7i wrote
Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
[deleted] t1_j52k0rk wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_j54kl0c wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5935vp wrote
[deleted]
iisoprene t1_j5294px wrote
Naïve question but, are there any documented cases of people losing fingers from nail salon UV exposure?