Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

iNstein t1_ja14080 wrote

I hooe you had the sense to vote no.

7

turnip_burrito t1_ja16023 wrote

i voted yes

−2

ArthurParkerhouse t1_ja1jfsn wrote

Why, though?

4

turnip_burrito t1_ja1msa3 wrote

becuz i know what the definitoin of the singularity is. duh

The Technological Singularity is a name originally derived from mathematics and physics that describes a point where the model breaks down (in that case due to an infinity, or discontinuity/loss of analyticity) and no further well-defined predictions can be made.

The technological singularity similarly applies the name to the concept of a time in human history where technological development (for example the development of human-level AI) sets a limit on how far we can predict. Anything after the singularity is unpredictable to people that exist before the singularity occurs.

As a large language model developed by OpenAI, I cannot predict the future with any certainty, and cannot say whether a Technological Singularity is imminent. The future is complex, and there are many contributing factors that will determine whether a Technological Singularity will occur.

In conclusion, the singularity is a point in time beyond which humans cannot predict due to technological development. However, when and how such an event will occur is the subject of much discussion and debate.

​

see, i wrote that myself without any referals. now u see why i voted yes

0