YobaiYamete t1_j72mc44 wrote on February 3, 2023 at 5:03 PM

A welcome change, but they will need to make chatGPT faster to respond if they want people to be able to really use it on the fly

AllNinjas t1_j72o9ts wrote on February 3, 2023 at 5:15 PM

The hourly rate limits is something that probably needs to be addressed for power users. Especially when CGPT is wrong a lot and requires a lot of rewording

ttylyl t1_j7345sl wrote on February 3, 2023 at 6:55 PM

I think they should do like a free, $5 a month, $20 a month system, where free is limited $5 is less limited ai, faster and more per hour, and $20 is near unlimited(need anti bot system) full ai capability, and fastest response times.

I feel like that will allow most people to either use for free or only as much as a music app, while power users can really get the most out of it, and it’s worth $20 to them.

datsmamail12 t1_j76zyzn wrote on February 4, 2023 at 3:47 PM

I think that 20$ a month is still way too much for a primitive AI. 5$ a month for full capabilities would be alright though. Maybe a model where you buy it for lifetime for 250 dollars could be alright as well. It's still a very limited AI. Maybe GPT4 would be worth the 20$ but that's my opinion I guess.

purepersistence t1_j773lz8 wrote on February 4, 2023 at 4:12 PM

>buy it for lifetime for 250 dollars

If AI takes off then in a few years using gpt4 will be like using a trs80 with 4KB ram and a tape drive.

datsmamail12 t1_j77bgtu wrote on February 4, 2023 at 5:04 PM

That's why I said it's too expensive for a subscription with 20 dollars a month. We're in the AI wars between companies right now. We will be seeing a lot of alternatives in 2023 to chatGPT,the price model they chose is kind of ridiculous considering Bing will have GPT4. Idk this is very weird.

ttylyl t1_j77hpb5 wrote on February 4, 2023 at 5:46 PM

They’re saying each print costs up at 5 cents, so that’s only 20 prompts for $1, kinda spendy.