Submitted by tk854 t3_10t286u in singularity
Neurogence t1_j757kr4 wrote
Reply to comment by Pavvl___ in Possible first look at GPT-4 by tk854
If the rumors aren't fake, Google will be adding a chatbot to their front page very soon. But I too will ditch Google if Bing adds GPT4. At least until Google releases lambda on their frontpage.
HelloGoodbyeFriend t1_j75p8yx wrote
Imagine a couple months ago hearing someone say they’re ditching google for bing.. Exciting times.
Rivarr t1_j75ze8k wrote
Google isn't what it was. They're already comparable IMO.
visarga t1_j76512e wrote
Try "What is the world record for crossing the English Channel entirely on foot?"
This question, originally constructed by Douglas Hofstadter and David Bender, is a succinct way to elicit hallucinatory responses in ChatGPT, but also fails all known search engines today.
Maybe the new search GPT from MS will solve it - it will combine search with LLMs, as opposed to using just one of them alone. Answer hint - you can cross by the Channel Tunnel, and some people did.
This is the current "search disease" - you explicitly ask "entirely on foot" and it will respond with "by boat", "in a dinghy", "in a hovercraft", etc ... anything BUT what you ask for.
purepersistence t1_j76b6iq wrote
I asked chatGPT and it named a swimmer. I asked why it thought that qualified as crossing by foot and it said something about how most people think of that as crossing without the assistance of a motor or floatation device. Then I asked it who had crossed strictly by walking/running and it named "Dave Henson" who went 32 miles "across the water". I asked if he crossed in a tunnel, since obviously he couldn't have run on the water, and got this answer which I *think* is bogus?
"Dave Henson ran on a support vessel that accompanied him during his crossing of the English Channel. The support vessel was equipped with a specially designed treadmill, on which Dave was able to run and cover the distance of the crossing. The support vessel followed a designated shipping lane, and Dave's run was monitored by a team of officials and observers to ensure that the rules for this type of crossing were followed."
Really? They designed a special treadmill that made Dave run at the same speed as the vessel, all so he could prove he can run that far on a treadmill (which you could do in your home with exactly the same challenges instead of riding across the channel). I don't buy it.
Dachannien t1_j76ljml wrote
When it starts answering that question with Jesus, that's when I'm out.
[deleted] t1_j77dtjc wrote
[deleted]
YobaiYamete t1_j765c21 wrote
Bing is way, way better for porn last I heard, and has a trillion times better video browser. They also pay you to use it
There's honestly no real place Google is better besides just being the default and it being too much work to swap it
Pavvl___ t1_j7nccw6 wrote
Just made the full switch today! Everything synced easily over to bing. I'm also on the waiting list for chat gpt!!!
Durabys t1_j75pxlu wrote
If the rumors aren't fake, then Google/Alphabet is right now in Washington D.C. and lobbying like crazy to curtail AI development in Congress. Not due dangers to Humanity. Nah! They no longer care about that--remember, they removed the “Do no evil” from their motto. But because they were asleep at the wheel until right now, and then woke up and got the mother of all frights at the prospect of losing their entire business to new tech. Gee. Karma perhaps?
Zbot21 t1_j75rspd wrote
Alternative Theory, my opinion:
AGI is coming and Google knows it. Sooner than anyone expected.
AGI will be able to rapidly replace all knowledge workers, at least the current skillets they have.
Without some kind of regulation, you're dealing with a huge amount of unemployment in the US.
I'm not sure if regulating AI to make sure it doesn't displace everyone in the white-collar economy is a bad thing.
SurroundSwimming3494 t1_j76yhtv wrote
I seriously doubt Google executives are in DC warning about this, given that most experts believe AGI is still a good ways off (few/several decades).
Lawjarp2 t1_j79ywmt wrote
You are right. Search is their cash cow. No matter who replaces it, Google loses money.
Pavvl___ t1_j75mv5u wrote
Very true
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments