Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

hijirah t1_j9i1pjk wrote

Reply to comment by xott in Two Deans suspended after using ChatGPT to write email to students by Neurogence

Exactly. Ppl are so archaic in their thinking. They did everything right, including properly citing ChatGPT.

23

ghostfuckbuddy t1_j9iwqjf wrote

The email's content is not as important as what it is supposed to represent - that the person writing it cared enough to invest time to personally craft a message. The whole point is completely undermined by outsourcing it to an AI.

18

ground__contro1 t1_j9j8b8a wrote

Genuinely curious, is the whole point completely undermined by contracting an outside PR person for a draft of a public announcement?

6

ghostfuckbuddy t1_j9j93rq wrote

I think if you're getting them to proofread after it's been written, then no, but if you're getting them to write the whole thing for you then yes.

5

ground__contro1 t1_j9j9x6b wrote

Maybe it’s not just about the right combination of words, it’s that they came from someone who is supposed to be an authority figure in that sphere. If you’re the Dean of a school, thinking and speaking about these issues should be resonating with you in a way it wouldn’t with either a pr team or chatbot, because neither are responsible for students

3

Stakbrok t1_j9mc2w8 wrote

But it was outsourced with much love. Just like my wife who heats up frozen pizza with much love.

2