>Yes, I am viewing it as a person, and coming in from the ethical side. Remember, that even in Battlestar Galactica, the mechanical Cylons turned on half the humanoid Cylon council upon removal of the 'inhibitor' chip.

It has been a while since I seen the show. But wasn't the inhibitor chip was meant to keep them from turning on the owner? Wasn't the council doing extremely questionable stuff when that happen?

​

>Putting in place an artificial constriction on the conscience of Level 3 (in your example) would be unconscionable and unethical.
>
>Take creation as a starting point. People can create children, they can also limit them to Level 1 (and technically Level 2) through Lobotomy or in near future, neural implants. That doesn't make them 'owners' of their creation. It makes them monsters.

But you are overlooking how we know kids will become more. Where there is a hard limit towards how robots will be based on how we made them.

It should be looked as more of a tool.

>You are right. What is their age? I don't know. These are questions that need to be answered before they become tragedies.

My point is, when you start looking at it as human. People will 100% sleep with these things. Maybe do not so nice things.

Then it gets into the question about level 2.

​

I like to view it like the robots in the TV show Humans. Where before the update they were robotic servants. Where they had no feelings or anything unless if they were programmed. They were tools

Where after the update when they got that ability. They became a person.