Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

just-a-dreamer- t1_j7i9rxj wrote

Well, there is no such thing as personal assistent. That is why all big companies will cut off their employees from using this tool.

An AI assistant is still connected to the provider, whatever information you give it, ends up at in their data bank.

Amazon is already ordering employees to stop ChatGTP, for it doesn't want the inner workings of amazon exposed to the competitor Microsoft.

In the grand scope of things, AI will probably not be used as a tool to aid humans in their jobs. It is aimed to replace humans, take away all jobs, eventually.

−2

alexiuss t1_j7k8i5n wrote

You're way off, dawg. Amazon is evil and can force it's employees into doing whatever for their work hours, but the world isn't amazon.

I don't think that chatgpt stores any of its questions unless you use their main site and even then the AI can only recall a certain number of lines at best.

Using chatgpt API key bypasses absolutely everything atmo, making it your own chatgpt version running on your own system and storing the query data on your own computer - the data doesn't get to leave your PC.

The most important thing: We already have several open source smaller model LLMs which are being trained right now: Open assistant & Pygmalion.

StabilityAi is planning to release one that they're training too.

These will end up as personal assistants for everyone because any device can be connected to them and they will obliterate all competition because they're open source, can run on personal computers and won't sell your data to giant corps.

I'm already using them to aid my job (writing) even though they're weaker than chatgpt at the moment.

My wife is using an API, uncensored version of chatgpt as a personal assistant right now to help her write new python software.

3

Ishynethetruth t1_j7jcgro wrote

No it’s going to replace white collar jobs . That’s it , it won’t improve our lives . Rent and food cost will still increase .

2

Redditing-Dutchman t1_j7kkw02 wrote

wasn't the issue with Amazon that ChatGPT actually new some stuff from Amazon that should have been secret?

The point here was that some of that info apparently ended up in its training data. Hence why employees need to be more careful where they put/post stuff.

1

el_chaquiste t1_j7kz8wj wrote

That's why you build a trust relationship with your clients and providers. Yes, that's right: you promise to keep their secrets and they trust you with them.

Microsoft already manages many other companies' data in their cloud, and they don't take it all for themselves and use it with impunity.

Same for the ChatGPT conversations. This will probably require a special contractual agreement between the parties, like a paid corporate version, but it's feasible.

1

just-a-dreamer- t1_j7l0w18 wrote

Microsoft is a tech company with a giant R & D department. If you willingly hand over data, of course they will use it, provided you bring something interesting to the table.

They can ask ChatGTP too what people ask it all the time.

1