Submitted by flowday t3_118lycd in singularity
IndependenceRound453 t1_j9iqtbg wrote
Reply to comment by CustardNearby in OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry by flowday
>Layoffs are gonna be massive.
No, they aren't because what you're describing isn't gonna happen (at the very least not with current/near term AI). Be realistic.
The hopium on this sub is on another level. You guys upvote comments just because they sound pretty to you, even if they aren't the slightest bit rational.
DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR t1_j9lo8ju wrote
LOL tru
Savings-Juice-9517 t1_j9ix6v8 wrote
Exactly. I’m a full time programmer and AI, at least in its current form, definitely improves my productivity but is no where near the level where it will replace programmers or software engineers. Less than 5% of a programmers time is spent physically writing code but this subreddit seems to think that’s what programmers do all day
GPT-5entient t1_j9lbsfr wrote
>Less than 5% of a programmers time is spent physically writing code
Not sure where you work at, but I am a principal SDE with 16 YoE and even though I spend most of my time in meetings, helping more junior team members or just on communication in general I try to shoot for 40-50% of my time actually writing code and Copilot does help with that (I'd say maybe 20% productivity increase). Even our dev manager probably spends more than 5% of his time writing actual code (but most dev managers don't of course).
madali0 t1_j9j7siw wrote
As a non-programmer, i tried asking it to change one small addition to an indicator in tradingview and i had to keep giving it the errors i got and did additional searches on google until i figured it out. At the end, all i changed was just two lines of code and it took me a long time.
Basically, what i mean is that the person giving the prompts already needs to have some programming knowledge to get help.
Even if it becomes more advanced, i bet you'd need workers to know how to give it prompts (or have unique ai prompters as a new position) to get the best outcome.
I think it's true for ai art. I see great ai art online but when i do it, it usually comes out far worse. It's when i realize that if they are going to replace some lower level cheap artist, they'd still need some ai art prompter to know what keywords to give it and what filter to use to get the best art, and you'd also probably need some other person to actually sort through the outputs to see which best fits their needs.
For those basic stock pictures, it doesn't really change much. Imagine if an outlets is rushing out articles, and they write one on how drinking water is healthy and they need an imagine of a woman drinking water. Seems cheaper and easier to just choose one with their stock images subscription.
And if they need something really unique and special for a main product, they can't just let some middle manager type a prompt and use that. They have to call the prompt guy (or maybe more realistically, they'll outsource it to an ai generator company who has humans that receive what the company needs, they then do the promoting, choosing the best, and editing it to provide them the image that fits their needs.
Basically, for every job they do away with, they'll just create a new human need.
[deleted] t1_j9j1pqt wrote
[deleted]
Savings-Juice-9517 t1_j9j43yd wrote
You completely bypassed the points being made and instead were trying to make a pedantic semantics argument about two terms that are two halves of the same coin
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments