Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j985644 wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in AI Enhancement of classical music - would you notice the difference? by AlpineDimi

A cover typically includes permission from whoever holds the rights to the song

−1

the-powl t1_j98mmk1 wrote

so that makes it morally different? your point is flawed 😅

1

[deleted] t1_j98mso4 wrote

Changing something someone created with their permission is morally different than doing it without their permission. Why do you need that explained to you

2

the-powl t1_j98o27u wrote

Well first you said altering the work of someone after his dead is morally corrupt. Then you said it's okay if the one who holds the rights gives you permission. The first point is general enough that it contradicts the second though.

Anyway it's totally fine to reuse someones work. Above all for personal use.

1

[deleted] t1_j98oefd wrote

That’s a lot of words to not actually say anything

0