Submitted by [deleted] t3_1168ifz in singularity
turnip_burrito t1_j9841i9 wrote
Reply to comment by helpskinissues in Stop ascribing personhood to complex calculators like Bing/Sydney/ChatGPT by [deleted]
> No, it's not. We don't have any AI system even slightly being comparable to the intelligence of an insect.
Current versions speak like a human. Yes they are stupid in other areas.
Future versions will be behaviorally indistinguishable in all superficial ways, and won't need any sort of "divine spark" OP suggests. In any case, the qualia becomes crucial for personhood. Absent evidence of qualia, we'll need a worse method for determining personhood.
> We can't prove humans have qualia.
But your qualia is self-evident to you, so you can prove your qualia to yourself at least. And you can infer it for other humans based on physical similarity.
For machines we have very little to go on.
> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/unsimulable just sharing
Thank you.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments