Submitted by BlackstockTy476 t3_124v1w9 in singularity
Comments
[deleted] t1_je18q43 wrote
[deleted]
Esquyvren t1_je1alq2 wrote
I remember it was a game changer for traveling back in 2013-14. Especially eating out at places without English menus
BlackstockTy476 OP t1_je1ct6x wrote
Have you compared GPT to Google's translations? I've found them to be slightly better with context.
Specific-Chicken5419 t1_je1g71b wrote
I've not. But any language I've used to chat with gpt or variants, I've always gotten a response that has made sense in the context of the prompt used.
WarProfessional3278 t1_je1giqi wrote
Bad demo imo. The mom's Chinese is worse than English->Chinese google translate.
Plus, there are way too many tools out there that does real time speech to speech translation better than GPT.
BlackstockTy476 OP t1_je1p5th wrote
I believe this was proven wrong at least with GPT-4. It was shown to do translations better than Google and DeepL, but I agree with the demo i believe they're using an older version of GPT
[deleted] t1_je1phzj wrote
[deleted]
WarProfessional3278 t1_je1w1xo wrote
>It was shown to do translations better than Google and DeepL
Oh really? Do you know a good benchmark for that?
Astronaut100 t1_je25ox8 wrote
Bing Chat is significantly better than any translation app out there. It captures the context and emotion of the original text.
YaAbsolyutnoNikto t1_je28rvi wrote
A capybara isn’t a rat though, is it? It’s that thingy that looks like a guinea pig but that is the size of a pig.
Otherwise-Ad5053 t1_je2jezd wrote
👍 congrats on your hard work
MysteryInc152 t1_je2qmez wrote
not gpt-4 but i made some comparisons awhile back. Even before gpt-4, bilingual llms were way ahead of the game.
https://github.com/ogkalu2/Human-parity-on-machine-translations
BlackstockTy476 OP t1_je2s181 wrote
This is the app for those curious
https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id6446153491?pt=119272488&ct=d2&mt=8
OlivertReiseArnor t1_je30h2u wrote
I've tried using Bing Chat for translations before and it's done worse compared to GPT-4 based on my experience. There's a theory that it uses Bing translate instead of GPT-4, though I don't know how true that is.
It sometimes rejects translations as well, which I found pretty odd. Maybe it's because of the prompt? I actually did a comparison test on this on Japanese visual novel text, Humans vs GPT-4 vs Google Translate vs DeepL on this post. Most still prefer the human translation on that post, but I also did a blind test poll to see which one they think is better, and the human actually only won by 5 votes.
Edit: If you're on mobile and you can't see the GPT 4 translation, swipe left, it's a table.
OlivertReiseArnor t1_je314l1 wrote
GPT-4 is significantly better, especially when it comes to story translations. Did a test on Japanese visual novel text, comparing human, gpt-4, google, and deepl translations, and it's scarily good, enough to change the translation industry type of good.
Edit: If you're on mobile and you can't see the GPT 4 translation, swipe left, it's a table.
FoniksMunkee t1_je31x9q wrote
DL Translate is significantly better than google. I wouldn't use google as a gold standard.
FoniksMunkee t1_je3293s wrote
It's not a rat, but it is a rodent.
-ZeroRelevance- t1_je3zdfa wrote
imo it’s blatantly obvious with even just a few tests that GPT-4 is miles ahead of them, especially when translating large volumes of text. Even GPT-3.5 is comparable to them, likely better, although it’s definitely a closer comparison.
Spire_Citron t1_je4dklq wrote
See, a better use for his time would have been getting ChatGPT to roleplay as a loving mother.
Specific-Chicken5419 t1_je104gx wrote
Google translate has done that for years pretty well. You just need to download local libraries to have speech without internet.